Jump to content

Talk:Merchant Taylors' School, Northwood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Public Schools Act

[edit]

Merchant Taylors' School was not in fact included in the Public Schools Act of 1868. The school did not meet the definition of a public school. Therefore the sentence in the article is incorrect. It even says so in the article cited! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.129.169 (talk) 01:12, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Beginnings

[edit]

This is a long article, so it has taken me a long time to wikify it. It still needs work doing:

  • Many of the links need checking and (probably) disambigutating.
  • The history sub-sections may need reorganising, as they're just where it seemed apropriate as I was reading/skimming through, and thus are quite arbitrary in places. The time periods are nowhere near equal either.

Thryduulf 21:50, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Almost the entire page has been ripped directly from the school website - please check for copyright :-)


Can i just add that the page is bias come someone flag it? it offers no rational view —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willspy2 (talkcontribs) 09:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable OMT's

[edit]

I have just removed the following two entries from the list of OMT's. The first has just gone in, and looks very like a joke to me. The second has been in for some weeks, but I can't find any reference to him via Google, so I am suspicious.

ColinFine 22:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]



Disambiguation

[edit]

I'm not sure that I agree with the disambiguation. When one refers to 'Merchant Taylors' School' it is assumed that you are talking about Northwood unless one specifies the other schools. This is not just a matter of geography and which is local to you, as it might be with the Haberdashers schools, but in all works on the history of education, Merchant Taylors' always assumes Northwood. Since the school does not call itself by the disambiguated name I have renamed the disambiguation 'Merchant Taylors' Schools' so that it accurately lists the appropriate schools.

(this above was unsigned)

My reply: I am not sure that your comment that people assume that "Merchant Taylors' School" refers to the Northwood school unless specified otherwise is always true; I think it is class and geography based. For example do Americans really immediately think of the school in Northwood?? I have just checked the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography to see how they handled this and I found they use the formula "Merchant Taylors' School, London" to avoid any possible misunderstanding. Given that Wikipedia is aimed at people from across the globe who would not use this term the way some British people do, I feel it is safer to state which school is meant where possible.

Molybdomancer 11:38, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The correct attribution for clarity is Merchant Taylors' School, simply because it was officially founded by the Merchant Taylors' company as such,as their showpiece School, rather than by a philanthropic individual who happened to be a member of the Company, (as was the case, e.g.,with Sir Stephen Jenyns and Wolverhampton Grammar School). To specify either London or Northwood limits the School to a particular incarnation in a particular time period, whereas the over-riding ethos, culture and educational practices of the School are an evolving continuum, whether the School was sited in Suffolk Lane, Charterhouse Square, or Moor Park (Northwood). cf. Charterhouse, which is always referred to as Charterhouse, not as Charterhouse, Godalming or Charterhouse, London. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.85.20.157 (talk) 11:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I realise these comments are very old but just to add that I went to Merchant Taylor’s School, Crosby, and only became dimly aware that there was another school of the same name down south several years into my incarceration, sorry, education there. The school I was at referred to itself as Merchant Taylors’ School and people in Merseyside would absolutely assume that the Crosby boys’ school (or the girls’ school up the road) was being referred to if that name was used.

It’s absolutely a matter of geography and which is local to you, even though the northern school may be the new kid on the block having been founded in 1620 rather than 1561. Liberaljon (talk) 21:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jadeja

[edit]

I have just reverted the page to remove 'Mitulsinh Jadeja' from the list of OMT's. This is the third time this name has been added in the last month, by three different IP addresses all beginning 86 (not diagnostic, I know). Google finds only two entries for the name: this one, and http://static.namesdatabase.com/schools/UKMI/Northwood/MerchantTaylorsSchool.html, which lists him under 'class of 2000'.

Each time the name has been wikilinked only to Jadeja, which is an article about the Indian clan of that name. One of the three IP addresses also edited that article.

I feel reasonably sure that Mitulsinh Jadeja is a non-notable person, at or recently left MTS, who keeps adding himself to the list. ColinFine 23:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jadeja attended the School around the turn of the Millennium. His exact dates may be found in the Salvete/Valete sections of the School magazine, The Taylorian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.85.20.157 (talk) 11:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Begun Work

[edit]

I've begun the long slog of adding references and tidying this article up (changing it from reading word for word as the one on the school's site). If anyone wants to help, feel free.... michaelCurtis talk+ contributions 21:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Old Merchant Taylors (OMTs)

[edit]

Unfortunately nopne of these were sourced using reliable sources and we must use reliable sources, especially for living people, please source and return, SqueakBox 16:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Point, but I think the list (which I know is pretty accurate ayway) should be copied here as a guide for those whoi need to find references:

That's fine, I have removed some people from my old school even though I sat in the same class with them and the only reason I am choosing this school out of the many thousands we have articles on is because I had 2 brothers who went there. I see you are looking to make the article FA so in fact this will be helpful. What I have also done is removed the links from all the red link names, I am quite happy to see these people included but believe we should only link to living people when they actually have an article about them and when people restore them to this article they should eleave these people unlinked, SqueakBox 22:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Old Merchant Taylors (OMTs)

[edit]

Victoria Cross Holders

[edit]

Three Old Merchant Taylors have won the Victoria Cross:

michaelCurtis talk+ contributions 22:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OMT's again

[edit]

An anonymous editor has added two other historical dramatists, Thomas Kyd and John Webster, as OMT's, but without references. Kyd's article confirms this for him, but Webster's dos not - indeed, it says that extremely little is known about his life. Would the editor please add references? --ColinFine (talk) 21:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kyd's attendance at the school is well-documented. Webster's is accepted by an overhwleming majority of scholarly opinion. At random, e.g. "John Webster also attended the school, though probably after Mulcaster's retirement in 1586" (Julia Briggs, Professor of English, De Montfort University, "This Stage Play World - Texts & Contexts 1580-1625", Oxford University Press, page 196.

Father John, and Uncle, Edward Webster, were Freemen of the Merchant Taylors' Company. The family lived in St. Sepulchre's parish. It is therefore overwhelmingly likely - particularly given the pronounced rivalry between the Livery Companies, the educational practice of the time, and the scholarly framework of his oeuvre - that he attended the School. Some dubiety characterizes almost all Tudor records of this type. Spenser's presence at the School, for example, was similarly not incontrovertibly provable (for 300 years) until the coming to light of the Townley Hall MSS and their publication by A. B. Grosart in 1877. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.85.20.157 (talk) 11:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Merchts.gif

[edit]

Image:Merchts.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Sandy Lodge

[edit]

The following was added by User:Ninjie to an unrelated section further up. I have moved it here, and given it a title. Ninjie, please also sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes: ~~~~ --ColinFine (talk) 12:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC) [reply]

From the section 1908 - 1933 I removed the following line. "Many of the pupils of the school in the city now came from north London and the movement of the school was perhaps a case of Mohammed going to the mountain."

If someone can explain or justify the relation between what I removed and the original article, please, by all means do and replace it, otherwise I believe it was added in error and has nothing to do with the subject of the article.

-ninje 06/11/2001 4:38 GMT

No, it makes sense if you know the expression If the mountain won't come to Mohammed, Mohammed must go to the mountain. But that phrase is now very dated, and some people are afraid it will be found offensive, so it is best to remove it. But in any case the sentence is unreferenced, so it should be removed. (Actually, the whole section - indeed, most of the article - is unreferenced, but most of the section reports facts which can in principle be verified. This sentence is explaining the reason for something, so unless it can specifically be verified from a reliable source, it is original research and should be removed. --12:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. My mind did not err on the side of offense, but merely proper subject matter and vocabulary. Ninjie (talk) 23:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Ninjie[reply]

Multiple issues

[edit]

Firstly, this article has been correctly flagged as needing more inline references since 2011: these remain urgently needed. The POV tag also seems not to have been fully addressed. In addition, the article appears to have been used in an essay-like manner as a WP:COATRACK for a general dissertation on the English public schools in general, with for instance material on flogging and rebellions in other schools. Much of this could be cut; some perhaps moved to other articles. Several items have been tagged (long ago) as needing clarification. The article needs work, or radical pruning. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And, why are there redlinked names in the list of notable former pupils? Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]

I have suggested that Merchant Taylors' Prep School should be merged to here as it is a non-notable primary, as per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Any comments appreciated.CalzGuy (talk) 16:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I get where you're coming from here, and I would tend to agree with merging the articles. The only point I would raise is that Merchant Taylors' Prep School did used to be a different one (Northwood Prep School) and I feel that a merged article could ignore that fact too much. The has only operated as part of Merchant Taylors' School, Northwood for the past two years, whereas it operated for just over a hundred years independently. This is only a minor point, however I thought it might be appropriate to raise it. Secondly, I would also point out that the trend of primary schoo'ls being non-notable seems to be favoured towards state primarys, and not independent (or private/prep) schools. Most prep schools have remained on Wikipedia for years, whereas it is difficult to find most state primary schools on here. Thirdly, the school has not merged fully to become the part of the same establishment. The addresses are different and the buildings are seperate. The leadership is different. Therefore, it could more aptly be described as affiliated, as it is in the infobox of Merchant Taylors' School, Northwood as in a similar article at Ampleforth College where the infobox leads to the affiliated, but not the same school (St Martin's Ampleforth). Thanks, --Iambic Pentameter (talk / contribs) 20:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My whole point is that the content merged to here would tend to be the encyclopaedic stuff. There's not a lot in the article anyway, so a single paragraph such as
Merchant Taylors' Prep is the preparatory school for Merchant. It was originally Northwood Prep School, but merged into Merchant in 2015,[1][2][3] enabling Merchant Taylors' to become an all-through school from age 3 to 18. The headmistress of the prep school is Karen McNerney, who has taught at the school since 2001.[4]
There really is nothing else notable in the original article. At a push, a sentence about the 2 sites might be worth adding. CalzGuy (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough - that seems great. Thanks, Iambic Pentameter (talk / contribs) 20:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "NP Alliance with MTS | Merchant Taylors' Prep School". www.mtpn.org.uk. Retrieved 2016-12-04.
  2. ^ "About Us | Merchant Taylors' Prep School". www.mtpn.org.uk. Retrieved 2016-12-04.
  3. ^ "Merchant Taylors' create new prep through school merger". Independent Education. Retrieved 2016-12-04.
  4. ^ "Who's Who? | Merchant Taylors' Prep School". www.mtpn.org.uk. Retrieved 2016-12-08.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Merchant Taylors' School, Northwood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Merchant Taylors' School, Northwood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

History taken from school website

[edit]

As far as I can tell, the main and mostly unsourced history section, which was added in 2004 by User:Merchanttaylorsschoolnorthwood, was taken verbatim from the school website, archived here. It is too long ago to make revdel feasible. It does need re-writing with actual sources. Tacyarg (talk) 01:28, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]