Talk:10 (1979 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Romance Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Needs to be rewritten

This article needs a serious rewrite, especially the plot summary section. It's loaded with references to "hilarious scenes" and "use of subtle conversation" that make it sound more like a story than an encyclopedia article. I've never seen the movie, so will someone who has please do this? --FlamingSilmaril 18:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to get rid of the "hilarious" and "subtle" pov crap, but I haven't seen the movie either. Kweeket 18:01, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THIS movie made a star of Julie Andrews? I'm sorry, but Julie Andrews was a star long before 1979. 71.115.236.84 (talk) 04:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remake

Found a story about a remake but it was dated 2003. IMDB does still list a 10 remake as being in development by Blake Edwards but until a more without more recent article comes up it is maybe it is better not to include it in the article. -- Horkana (talk) 07:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plot Synopsis

George met with the priest the day after his argument with Sam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 10 (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002061735/http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/eberts-10-best-lists-1967-present to http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/eberts-10-best-lists-1967-present
Corrected formatting/usage for http://cornrows.co.uk/cornrowsfaq.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.buzzle.com/articles/cornrow-braid-styles.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Corn rows "heavily criticized"

Neither of the sources cited criticize the use of corn rows or mention the term "cultural appropriation" at all. In fact, neither are news sources from the time of the film. They are FAQs for people interested in trying the hair style. This remark should be removed or if indeed she was "heavily criticized," whoever wrote this should find an actual source. 2600:1700:3520:1B70:25C8:44B2:49AC:C83D (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I don't remember any such criticism from the time and this interview from Variety suggests that in fact the contemporary reaction from African American women was actually positive. JezGrove (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]