Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Customer Care

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect. Golbez 03:27, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Customer Care

Not encyclopedic - personal rant. Either delete or redirect to Customer service. --Areia 11:33, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Customer service. Megan1967 11:55, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect -- to Customer service. - Longhair | Talk 13:30, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested. Mgm|^(talk) 13:32, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
Redirect Lame-o rant from someone who apparently can't stand their customer-service job (to which one might ask why they applied for it/haven't quit). Certainly not an encyclopedia article by any stretch of the imagination. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:51, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
Redirect per everyone. Samaritan 14:32, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It I think its cute, If you have ever worked in customer service you would know. MistaEx 15:10, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- this edit by 135.214.66.241 (talk · contribs)
Keep It I think its educational, it looks a lot like a rant because it is written in first person but as someone who works in a call center it is 100% true. The average person thinks that if they assert that they are in charge, we will do whatever they ask, if people read this and actually thought about it, this is what customer care really is. This is the psychology of it, its instructional. I think its great. Plus, lets face it, theres how-to instructions for microbiology, isnt this more useful?Mislah 15:44, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- this edit by 135.214.66.240 (talk · contribs)
Keep it! Speaking as someone who works in the customer care industry, I can tell you for certain it is quite factual. Plus it is educational for the average consumer calling into a customer care department, screaming at some poor rep who is only there to make ends meat and had nothing to do with what happenned to the customer.
- this edit also by 135.214.66.241 (talk · contribs) JeremyA 01:25, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but mark as not-NPOV. This is a classic example of why Customer Care reps get a bad rep -- they assume that they are always correct and that, because they have the power to screw up someone's life, they're entitled to use that power vindictively (in other words, whenever the customer won't bend over and take it up the bodily orifice). Keep and corral the author off into a Wiki-Zoo where s/he can have buns and other inappropriate food-articles thrown at him/er --Simon Cursitor 07:08, 13 May 2005 (UTC) <?rant>[reply]
Redirect as above. It's the same thing. And add an additional redir at correctly capitalized Customer care. R adiant _* 09:11, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Redirect it's not a bad rant. Maybe someone might want to keep it. But it's nothing to do with Wikipedia. Naturenet 21:30, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Customer service. NSR 09:32, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Customer service. El_C 23:09, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Completely unencyclopedic. It's just a rant.--Heathcliff 04:38, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.