User talk:Benbest

• I prefer replies in the same page as the original post.
• Those who make more "private" comments should post here.
• To those who post on my TALK page, I will usually reply on my TALK page.

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archive

• /Archive 1: Jan 2005 - Feb 2006
• /Archive2: Apr 2006 - Jun 2013

New Talk Page

This is a fresh Talk page. See archive above

Invitation

Hello! As there is a Wikipedia article about you, you are cordially invited to contribute a short audio recoding of your spoken voice, so that our readers may know what you sound like and how you pronounce your name. Details of how to do so, and examples, are at Wikipedia:Voice intro project. Please feel free to ask for help or clarification on the project talk page, or my talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:56, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Telomerase RNA component, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Template (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

It may seem silly to reply to a bot, but I might as well justify myself. In edition Telomerase_RNA_component, I wanted a wikilink to the word template to clarify the meaning of that word in the context of the article (especially to readers for whom English is not the native language). Disambiguation pages often contain entries to Wikipedia pages that are specific to the meaning desired, but in this case the meaning desired was in the "Molecular genetics" section — which only contains links to DNA and RNA. Moreover, for reverse transcriptase, RNA is serving as a template for DNA, not for protein. But linking to the disambiguation page gives lots of relevant information that will make the concept of "template" clear enough to non-English speakers or children. --Ben Best 13:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Austrian school of economics and the Ludwig von Mises Institute, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Hipocrite (talk) 19:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rejuvenation Research, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biennial. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

The link to Biennial was done consciously. That page is not simply a disambiguation page, because the definition given at the beginning (which is the reason I made the link) is not contained in any of the subsequent links on that page. --Ben Best 12:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi Benbest, I noticed that your signature lacks any links to your user page or user talk page. Per WP:SIGLINK, editors must have at least one internal link to either your user page or user talk page. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

OK, I think I have figured-out how to do this. -- Ben Best:Talk 15:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kosmotropic may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• solvents (in water [[solvent]] are defined as '''kosmotropic''' (order-making) if they contribute to the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herbert M. Shelton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natural hygiene. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polyphyly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cold-blooded. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saul Kent

The article Saul Kent has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

living bio without checkable references

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. David Gerard (talk) 23:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fred and Linda Chamberlain

The article Fred and Linda Chamberlain has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Living bio with no third-party verifiable sourcing

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. David Gerard (talk) 20:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Fred and Linda Chamberlain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fred and Linda Chamberlain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred and Linda Chamberlain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:55, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cryonics Institute Logo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Cryonics Institute Logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:11, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Aubrey de Grey photo authorized.jpg

How can I contact SENS to verify the permission on that photograph? The file will be deleted unless we can verify the authorship (see c:Commons:Grandfathered old files). Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

• send a message to Aubrey de Grey at aubrey@sens.org --Ben Best:Talk 04:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 6 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Killifish page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

• • The edit created an apparent error because it referenced a citation in a different section than the section I was editing. However, there was no error when my editing was complete because the reference was able to access the other section. --Ben Best:Talk 11:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

"You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia"

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benbest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am in China where I am forced to use a VPN because China will not allow GMAIL. The quality of my edits does not justify blocking my ability to edit on Wikipedia until November 2017. Additionally, I will be returning from China next week. Ben Best:Talk 06:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you are not blocked directly and forgot to provide your IP address or exact block message, so we can't find the block that is affecting you. Note that Wikipedia very often blocks VPN addresses due to widespread rampant abuse. Yamla (talk) 11:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Benbest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have returned from China and am therefore no longer using a VPN. Please remove the blocking of my edits. A review of my edits should illustrate that they mostly enhance the scientific content and credibility (ample citations) of Wikipedia. --Ben Best:Talk 03:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you are not blocked directly and forgot to provide your IP address or exact block message, so we can't find the block that is affecting you. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 04:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Delta13C (talk) 12:11, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of CST Complex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CST Complex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CST Complex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VarunFEB2003 17:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

• Hello, you can ignore the above, this article is not being considered for deletion. Thanks for your work! Crow^Caw 18:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Senescence into Cellular senescence. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Benbest. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 25 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Low-pressure area page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

The problem was due to an "|" which was in the parameter field, but was not a parameter marker. It has been fixed. --Ben Best:Talk 01:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited S-Adenosyl-L-homocysteine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 23:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

extra sources

Hello, I removed an additional coindance source you added to the Bitcoin article. In general one source is enough. Sometimes two sources might be good in the case where content is controversial (meaning other editors suggest to delete it). But in general one is enough. There is an essay about this called WP:OVERKILL that also talks about too many sources. Mostly that overkill essay is about edit warring and I am not suggesting you were doing that. Just wanted to show you the essay in case you were curious. Happy editing :-) Jtbobwaysf (talk) 10:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Liberstad (Norway)

The article Liberstad (Norway) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GEOLAND; no legal recognition and no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:31, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Benbest. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

BitCoin forks

Please see the Talk:List_of_bitcoin_forks#Proliferation_of_unsourced_and_probably_not_notable_content discussion on the talk page. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced content

Please stop adding unsourced promotional content hyping the Latest and Greatest Whatever. This is not a newspaper or a blog. Jytdog (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Steemit shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced promotional content

• Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Steemit. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

• You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Steemit.

-- Jytdog (talk) 20:20, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

• You are the one engaging in unjustified reversions and edit warring. But you are too nasty a person to deal with and I am not prone to fighting like you are, so I will not carry this issue any further and will allow your reversion to stand. --Ben Best:Talk 21:52, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

btw, please be aware that the community has determined that holding a cryptocurrency and editing about that currency creates a conflict of interest.

If you hold steemit, please disclose that, and please refrain from editing directly about it or its competitors. Please see WP:COI.

Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 20:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

• I do not own STEEM or participate in the Steemit social networking community. I was updating a page was reading for the first time to make the information current. You continue to defame my character without any evidence, which shows what a nasty temperament you have. Please be more civilized. --Ben Best:Talk 21:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying that you don't hold Steem. Our articles on cryptocurrencies have been getting hammered by people hyping them, editing and behaving badly. The community has already indeffed two people coming out of those communities and I imagine there will be more to come. Jytdog (talk) 01:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of International School of Temple Arts

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International School of Temple Arts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Quek157 (talk) 17:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Deleted article has been restored & moved to Draft namespace

After a speedy deletion of the International School of Temple Arts article, I asked that it be restored. An administrator has restored it &, at a user's request, has moved it to Draft:International School of Temple Arts. I would suggest expanding the article as best as possible from the stuff.co.nz, redrocknews.com, & brigitte.de sources. There is also http://www.sueddeutsche.de/leben/als-teilnehmer-bei-einem-tantra-seminar-splitternackt-1.3757783?reduced=true, which is behind a paywall & is in German. Peaceray (talk) 07:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Mention of the topic

Were does either one of these refs mention the topic in question?

"Cholesterol crystals are believed to both impair myelin repair and aggrevate inflammation."

Also please read WP:MEDRS. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

• • Did you read either of these papers before asking your question or deleting my entry? It is hard to believe that you did.
  • First reference (comment on the second reference), first paragraph: "...insufficient clearance (phagocytosis) of damaged myelin by aged macrophages results in accumulation of cholesterol crystals in these cells, which elicits a maladaptive inflammatory reaponse that is associated with impaired remyelination>'
  • Second reference (Science 359:684 (2018), in this case all you needed to do was to read the abstract in order to see: "Aged phagocytes accumulated excessive amounts of myelin debris, which triggered cholesterol crystal formation and phagolysosomal membrane rupture and stimulated inflammasomes... inducing a maladaptive immune response that impedes tissue regeneration."

--Ben Best:Talk 12:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Apologies was looking at the wrong source. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

References

File:Aubrey de Grey photo authorized.jpg

You uploaded, File:Aubrey de Grey photo authorized.jpg, where you either stated or implied that you had permission of a third party to upload it; or that evidence of such permission would be provided on request.

Wikipedia currently needs the permission to be explicit and proven at the time of upload.

Please read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, which advises on how to confirm the permission you obtained from a third party.

It is also advisable to ask the third-party what source attribution they desire, as opposed to marking the image as having been "sent personally". ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:31, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Benbest. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Request

Can you please review this Wikipedia page? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ODEM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff at ODEM (talk • contribs) 07:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of BTC Markets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BTC Markets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BTC Markets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blumpf (talk) 20:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reed–Sternberg cell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:02, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:International School of Temple Arts

Hello, Benbest. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "International School of Temple Arts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 08:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Possible class project on the SASP page

I am thinking about having my 300 level Biology of Aging do a Wikipedia project on the Senescent-Asssociated secretory phenotype page this spring semester. Do you think there is enough there for a small class project to make a figure and to build on your work on the the page?Jparcoeur (talk) 12:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

I think that there is much that could be studied on this project, but I don't think I am able to answer your question. And I don't know what you mean by "make a figure" (a summary illustration?). If you are having trouble with having enough material, you could expand the subject to all properties of senescent cells. --Ben Best:Talk 15:27, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ben Best for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Best until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 09:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Endothelin edits

On my talk page you said, I am not confusing endothelin with endothelium, but I did mis-spell as endothelin-1 as endothelium-1. I generally avoid "revert wars", but I reverted your revert in this case because I did not notice my mis-spelling, and because the information I wrote was solidly based on information in the review articles I cited. One of these articles is easily enough accessed by PMC text: Endothelial function and the regulation of muscle protein anabolism in older adults so you can see for yourself. Unless you have access to a university library system, you may not have access to the other article, but the information I reproduced is accurate. Please revert your revert.

Your content and choice of sources are off topic. There are several reviews on endothelin (not about endothelium). --Zefr (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

You are confusing my mis-spelling with being off-topic and you are not reading the papers I cited to verify that the subject of those papers included discussion about endothelin-1. It is incorrect to conclude that the paper titled "Endothelial function and the regulation of muscle protein anabolism in older adult" does not included the information about endothelin-1 that I described. You could verify this by reading the paper rather than just looking at the title. For the other paper, in the paragraph before Protection from adverse effects of risk factors the Seals, et al paper states "Expression of ET‐1 in vascular endothelial cells increases with age in sedentary healthy men (Donato et al. 2009)." where ET-1 is abbreviated from endothelin-1 at the top of that paragraph. Please revert your revert (with the spelling correction, of course). --Ben Best:Talk 19:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Caps and redirect bypassing in journal names

You should cite journals like this instead. Journals should not be capitalized, and redirects should not be bypassed (this is especially important because if a journal is created in the future, we want readers to be taken to the journal article, and not the lists). Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

You're still doing this BTW. It's annoying to have to clean up after you when this could simply be done correctly the first time. Please be more considerate in the future. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your patience @Headbomb (Headbomb) or even your impatience, and I apologize for my lack of understanding what you were telling me. I now understand that you have created redirections for the "Trends (journals)" journals which do not have wikipedia entries, such that if I write | journal = Trends in Ecology & Evolution or | journal = Trends in Molecular Medicine, both will redirect to the "Trends (journals)" page. That simplifies things. I would rather use this facility than capitalization and redirection. Have you implemented redirection for every journal under "List of MDPI academic journals" ? The notes at the top of that page only list redirection for Aerospace (journal) and Biosensors (journal). What other journal lists has redirection been implemented for? I think it would be helpful to put note informing other Wikipedia editors of the redirection facility at the top of such pages, to be more general than the Aerospace and Biosensors journals. I would do this myself, except that I defer to your vast editing knowledge. I may not literally be a "newbie", but compared to you I am. -- Ben Best:Talk 12:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Most journals have redirects setup yes. It's possible some of the newer ones don't, but redlinks are fine to have. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

I have attempted to emulate your efforts by creating a redirect page for the journal Integrative medicine research Integrative Medicine Research to List of Elsevier periodicals#I, but it doesn't look up to your standards. So perhaps you can clean-up this mess I made as well, @Headbomb. --Ben Best:Talk 16:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

I failed to capitalize all initial letters in the journal article, but can't seem to fix that mistake, @Headbomb. --Ben Best:Talk 16:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Like I said, redlinks are fine, see WP:REDLINKS. You don't have to create redirects. Redirects were created for MDPI and Frontiers because those publishers churn journals like people give candy at Halloween, and most MDPI/Frontiers journals aren't individually notable. It's also pretty easy to find if a journal is published by MDPI or Frontiers, and there's not much else you need to know about individual journals. Elsevier publications however, are hugely varied, published under dozens of imprints, regularly acquired, sold, etc... which makes mass redirects to List of publications much less desirable, or needed. s Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Again, here. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Pterostilbene edits

On my talk page, you said: You cited MDPI, although the journals are reported to be of variable quality. What evidence do you have that Molecules is not of acceptable quality, other than the apparent bias you have against Pterostilbene? Do you really believe you are being objective about this subject, or about me?

Publishing in MDPI is a WP:REDFLAG for Wikipedia editors because we know editorial practices may be compromised or absent. There seems to be general agreement by medical editors that each article in an MDPI journal be assessed individually, with skepticism.

Concerning this edit, which I suggest should be viewed as possibly non-replicable results (see WP:MEDANIMAL and WP:WHYMEDRS), this lab research does not belong in a section on Research because it is far too preliminary and potentially misleading to non-medical readers, WP:NOTJOURNAL #7. As we have for the Research section on Resveratrol, the Research section should be devoted to the highest-quality human studies available. Such a qualification is self-limiting for pterostilbene because there is no "high-quality human research" on this compound. For many articles, such as endothelin and pterostilbene, your editing indicates a preference to treat lab research as informative about human health or disease (pharmacokinetics is a separate matter). You are right - I disagree, and will continue to challenge, preferring that an encyclopedia is WP:NOTEVERYTHING and follows rigorous WP:MEDRS reviews. Zefr (talk) 17:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CTBP1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transcription.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata journal links

In edits like these, please don't add Wikidata links like you did. Linking on Wikipedia should be to Wikipedia articles, not Wikidata entries. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Phytic acid, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You need to consider your sources more carefully, as you are choosing references poorly for several articles you have edited. A strong WP:MEDRS review source would be needed to make statements about anti-cancer effects. Check first the FDA or EFSA websites to see where regulatory agencies have reviewed anti-cancer evidence - you won't find any for phytic acid. Be more careful. Zefr (talk) 21:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

On what grounds do you justify your claim that reviews in the Journal of Nutrition or Journal of AOAC International are unreliable sources? --Ben Best:Talk 22:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

This statement reveals the issue with your editing: you are not reading (not understanding?) WP:MEDRS. It is not a matter of general reliability, but rather an issue of expertise by authors and editorial boards on the field of medicine and anti-disease evidence for Wikipedia content. Neither of those sources is a location where experts on human diseases publish - see WP:MEDASSESS - "Assessing evidence quality" means editors should determine quality of the type of source and quality of the publication. Respect the levels of evidence." Try to understand this: you are placing a significant amount of misinformation into the encyclopedia because your choice of sources for nutrition, human health, and anti-disease topics is often from non-expert literature, then you misinterpret (such as from lab research on rodents) a human health benefit or anti-disease effect. This produces misinformation that unsuspecting users may believe, and creates work for other medical editors to correct your errors. Zefr (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Re: BioMed Central

Hi ben, the BMC series is BioMed Central's own collection of journals, led by their own staff editors. The other titles on their platform are led by independent academic editorial boards, and often owned by other organisations (societies, institutes, etc) contracting the publishing platform etc from BioMed Central. There's more info explaining it here: https://www.biomedcentral.com/p/the-bmc-series-journals Joe D (t) 18:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of American Open Currency Standard

The article American Open Currency Standard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, no references, nothing in a WP:BEFORE - no evidence this was ever notable in any way, let alone sufficient coverage for WP:NORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 09:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Klotho (biology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kilo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Aubrey de Grey photo authorized.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aubrey de Grey photo authorized.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Cdbc" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Cdbc has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 5 § Cdbc until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on International School of Temple Arts

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page International School of Temple Arts, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about ATG (autophagy acronym)

Hello Benbest, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, ATG (autophagy acronym), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATG (autophagy acronym).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Xoak}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

X (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pulmonary vein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atrium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Benbest. Thank you for your work on Ganglionated plexi. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for starting this article. The scope seems to be the cardiac ganglionated plexuses (or plexi), so it's worth considering a page move to include the work 'cardiac' in the title. I think that this is relevant, because, for example, the enteric nervous system consists of a set of ganlionated plexuses. There is much more than can be added, so I think that the 'stub' template is still warranted.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)