Talk:The Fifteen Decisive Battles of the World

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Names of the battles

The titles I gave the battles are how Creasy referred to them in the book (these are the chapter titles). For example, he has "Victory of the Americans over Burgoyne at Saratoga" rather than "Battle of Saratoga". Also "Victory of Arminius over the Roman Legions under Varus" rather than "Battle of Teutenberg Forest". Is there a consensus which we should use? I prefer Creasy's versions, with links to the appropriate articles. Does anyone else have an opinion either way? --JW1805 02:06, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I agree with using the chapter titles. Cribcage 20:16, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Other battles

I do believe that the "Miracle on the Vistula" of 1920 should be among those listed. Kazak 22:03, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the war in question preserved the integrity of Poland for only a couple more decades and failed to stop the spread of the USSR's dominion, it's not a decisive battle.

Besides Poland was the aggressor. The Miracle on the Vistula was basically Poland being saved from its own hubris by the civil war exploding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.180.97.112 (talk) 02:47, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(As an aside, that battle is included as one of J.F.C.Fuller's Decisive Battles (written after WW2) because if the Bolsheviks had won Germany might well have gone Spartakist/Communist in 1920, and subsequent events would have been very different.Paulturtle (talk) 00:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Some other battles to consider. The Battle of Yarmuk kicked off the wave of Islamic conquests in 636 AD by securing Syria for Islam. While the Battle of Tours in 722 AD and the Battle of Vienna in 1683 AD turned back the Umayyads of Hispania and the Ottomans respectively. The Mongolian Empire should have several on the list. After all, the Mongolians were responsible ultimately for the fall of many states. And their few uncontested defeats (eg, at Ain Jalut in 1260 and the two failed invasions of Japan in 1274 and 1281. In the new world, the Battle of Tenochtitlán in 1521 resulted in the fall of the Aztec Empire and the begining of the colonization of the New World by the European powers.

For ancient battles, the defeat of the Assyrians and Egyptians at Carchemish in 605 BC marks both the end of the Assyrian Empire and the end of ancient Egypt as a serious power in the Middle East.

Ultimately, it can be very subjective which wars should be considered sufficiently "decisive" and which ones shouldn't. While it'd be an interesting exercise, I'm not sure it is useful to make a Wikipedia list of decisive battles of history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KarlHallowell (talk • contribs) 05:43, November 26, 2005

This article is about a book. The battles listed are Creasy's choices for "decisive battles". Having an article listing Wikipedians' choices for decisive battles would be original research. --JW1805 ^(Talk) 01:31, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But the whole point of the book is to show how superior Euros are over other peoples! So of course Yarmuk (Arabs > Byzantium) and Carchemish (2 non-European states) wouldn't count. Although Tenochtitlan and Vienna were two European victories with important consequences. Hmm. Also, I don't think any Mongol victory (or defeat, for that matter) is particularly famous. Brutannica 02:34, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In case anyone cares, here are my own opinions:

Tsushima - showed the world decisively that an East Asian country could defeat a European one;
Manzikert - a major setback for the Byzantine Empire, first entry of the Turks into Turkey, set the stage for the Crusades
Yarmuk
Salamis, instead of Marathon - I think Persia just burned its fingers with Marathon, in 480 B.C.E. the threat was much more serious
Sekigahara maybe - ended the Warring States Era in Japan, inaugurated the Edo period of peace & prosperity
Panipat - first entry of Moguls in India
Tenochtitlan
Talas River - pushed Chinese out of Central Asia
probably Gettysburg instead of Vicksburg

Of course, there are many wars and battles in history, and their importance easily depends on how important you gauge various peoples and countries as being (example: the Texan historian). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brutannica (talk • contribs) January 30, 2006.

The battles listed are Creasy's choices for "decisive battles". Having an article listing Wikipedians' choices for decisive battles would be original research. JW is right as usual. It really does not matter what we think are the 15 most decisive battles of world history. (and Midway, for instance, has made every list done since WWII) This article is about the book by Sir Edward Shepherd Creasy, and HIS list. 11:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Title?

My Barnes&Noble edition of this book lists it as Fifteen Decisive Battles of the Western World: From Marathon to Waterloo-while this article's title leaves out the western part. Does anyone know which one is correct? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YankeeDoodle14 (talk • contribs) September 2, 2006.

The Barnes&Noble edition is wrong. The title of Creasy's book doesn't have "Western" in it. --JW1805 (Talk) 03:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The title of Creasy's book doesn't have "Western" in it, period. What someone does to puff up sales doesn't change what the original title BY THE AUTHOR was. old windy bear 11:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary

This list is arbitrary, as supposed to a book of XIX century and rather patriotic. It has no sense to avoid the Battle of Lepanto, as neither including the Spanish Armada (it was not a battle were the fate of the world was being decided, neither even the fate of 1 nation).

The text itself is rather Eurocentric, and at that, Anglocentric. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 09:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Battle of Vertières

The Battle of Vertières which created the first black republic in the Western Hemisphere and led to Napoleon Bonaparte's defeat in Haiti, should also be considered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.136.194 (talk) 02:38, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Fifteen Decisive Battles of the World: from Marathon to Waterloo is a book written by Sir Edward Shepherd Creasy and published in 1851." You may have difficulty contacting Sir Edward at this late stage with your suggestion that he should consider it. 195.149.121.121 (talk) 13:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting pictures and text

Pictures are sitting on top of text--I don't know how to fix this. Holy (talk) 08:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]