Talk:Fallacy of the accident

I don't understand this fallacy. Isn't calling this point of view a fallacy POV? Martijn faassen 18:56, 22 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a philosophical point of view to me, so an encyclopedia shouldn't be declaring this a fallacy. Can someone motivate this article here? Martijn faassen 11:59, 23 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article was completely incomprehensible and seemed to gain incomprehensibility with further edits, I've replaced this with a description of the logical fallacy that I could find with some research on google. This replaces completely the original article. Martijn faassen 19:21, 26 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the version by KingGeekoid, and I think it makes MUCH more sense than this one does. However, I don't know anything about philosophy. Jaberwocky6669 01:15, Aug 2, 2004 (UTC)