Talk:A Course in Miracles
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Course in Miracles article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Course in Miracles - Original Edition was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 05 January 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into A Course in Miracles. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Gary Renard was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 August 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into A Course in Miracles. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
|
||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Could use a content section
[edit]This article gives some background and a very basic explanation of what it is, but it lacks even a fundamental description of its content. 166.182.250.207 (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
What if the reason the article only gives the most basic outline of the Course is because no one really knows what it is talking about? For what if there is no reason or light in this darkness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.189 (talk) 09:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Journalist
[edit]Matthew Remski passes WP:N. If you think he doesn't, this is not the place to argue that, instead you should submit his article for deletion. Do I like yoga? No, but it's a free country. People don't have to ask for my permission in order to practice yoga. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- What if, seeming to tell the truth, ACiM is a book of lies?
- What if, appearing to heal, the book contains many harmful ideas?
- What if, having promised to show the/a way - the Course sets out to mislead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.153.122 (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia isn't about WP:THETRUTH, but about WP:Verifiable information form reliable sources. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
A Course In Miracles
[edit]it is misleading to claim that this teaching " borrows from New Age ideas " There is no evidence of this at all. It is highly original in content. Of course those indoctrinated with familiar Christian dogma, are going to dismiss it, on entirely spurious grounds 80.189.60.71 (talk) 22:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- The statement is sourced. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have watched this subject butchered many times over many years, this rendition is by far the worst.
- ‘A Course In Miracles’ is a modern day manual for the transformation of Mind, as given by Jesus. 2001:8003:321A:7001:1CE2:EBD3:D857:1D5 (talk) 12:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- First, I'm not a Christian, so I have no reason to defend Christian dogmas. Similarly, there are religion scholars who ascribe ACIM to the New Age, but do not write in order to defend Christian dogmas.
- Second, see emic and etic. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Start-Class Spirituality articles
- Low-importance Spirituality articles
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- Start-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- Start-Class New religious movements articles
- High-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles