Talk:Government Flying Service

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airline project.

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (289)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,033)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,442) • Stub-Class articles (6,728)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (390) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,338)

Military history: Aviation / Asian / British / Chinese / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	British military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	European military history task force

Military or civil?

Why is this classified under Category:Military of Hong Kong if it is not a civil unit?--Huaiwei 14:37, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If the article on RHKAAF, GFS's predecessor, is separated, then this article will not be categorised under a military category anymore. — Insta ntnood 14:48, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

Then it should obviously be seperated as soon as possible. Classifying this article here is highly erroneous and misleading.--Huaiwei 15:22, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article has the details. — Insta ntnood 15:25, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

Sikorsky S-76

According to this article, the GFS operated 6 Sikorsky S-76 helicopters. According to the article Royal Hong Kong Auxiliary Air Force, the RHKAAF transferred 8 S-76 helicopters (6 S-76A and 2 S-76C) to the GFS in 1993. Anybody know what happened to the extra 2. -- 91.84.39.186 (talk) 14:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

US Sanctions

Shouldn't this article note that the GFS is subject to US sections? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.64.242.223 (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of Edit in "History" Section

User:Citobun: Noted that you reverted my edits to the captioned section. Given that your edit summary "Whitewashing" is quite vague, and your revert removed multiple points contained in the edit, I am not sure which part of the edit you object to specifically.

I invite you to clarify this so we may have a discussion on how we can refine the edit.

Thank you Carter00000 (talk) 13:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]