Talk:Pinotage

Controversial?

I have removed the word controversial. For a start it was illogical - how could a wine variety be controversial? On the other hand controversy might surround it, but I don't believe that it does. I suspect that the writer was trying to convey the concept that the grape variety has had a chequered history of success. The word controversial in my view does not answer.Tashkop 04:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Rewrite

Completely rewritten, really needs some photos. Has anyone got a primary source for van Rensburg's "child rape" quote? FlagSteward 19:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Great rewrite. Well done. I have however reverted here the comments of Tashkop. Discussion should not be removed from talk pages. --Bduke 22:23, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Child Rape comment

Is it really a "famous" assessment or needed in the article? I have to admit that it is somewhat disturbing. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 19:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't seem too necessary in an encyclopedic entry on the grape, and in its current format it feels incorporated insensitively brief. For inclusion I think it needs context. MURGH ^disc. 23:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

It's an infamous assessment by a notorious winemaker in South Africa, where Pinotage comes from. I restored it without regard to content because it was was deleted without comment; such blanking of sourced text consitutes vandalism and should be reverted immediately on that basis alone.

Remember, Wikipedia is not censored. The comment highlights the fact that Pinotage has a history of some controversy. I must admit in looking over the History section, deleting the entire 2-sentence last paragraph won't hurt the article, although it would be a shame not to reference the cited source about this notable winemaker. -Amatulic (talk) 00:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Well overall the article does need some work. While I agree that Wikipedia is not censored, I think that is meant to be taken in context and balance of the encyclopedic worth of something that is "censorable". While Pinotage is certainly controversial, I do have my doubts on the historical or "encyclopedic" nature of the comment that would merit its inclusion. Would it pass the 100 yr test? I just don't see a collective benefit that the comment has that would warrant its use. Eye catching, yes. Encyclopedic, debatable. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 00:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I also agree Amatulic was right to revert on principle, but would wish a comment like that was used in a section explaining the controversy in depth rather than used as a quick 'stunner'. MURGH ^disc. 01:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Looking at the history it seems that the editor removed the statement before without comment and was reverted by Bduke. I'll mention this conversation to the editor and see if we can get any clarifying comments. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 01:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I recall I reverted it because it was properly referenced. It is a bit over the top, but much of what is said about wine is over the top or pretentious. I guess I just have the Australian pretty robust view on language. As another example of this, I have just received for Christmas, "Quaff 2008". The author grades the wines he includes into three categories, "bloody good", "good" and "pretty good". I doubt "bloody good" would be accepted in the US or UK, but nobody bats an eyelid here. --Bduke (talk) 02:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

It's a no-brainer to keep it IMO. For one thing I think we've a systemic bias problem here - if Robert Mondavi had said the same about Zinfandel, our US editors would be crying to keep it in. Van Rensburg is more significant in his industry than Mondavi is to the US industry, he's arguably the best winemaker in SA, so his views on SA winemaking are very notable. And aside from being one of the all-time memorable quotes about viticulture (OK - it's not a long list), it's a perfect illustration of Pinotage's "controversial" history mentioned by Tashkop above in reference to the pre=rewrite version of the article. I'd suggest that you'd be hard put to find a more authoritative "nay" in any controversy on Wikipedia! My only regret is that so far I haven't been able to find a primary source for it, although it gets a mention in just about any serious article about Pinotage or van Rensburg. :-) PS. I've some Kanonkop, although not one of the 80's ones, I'll try and take a pic of it some time.... FlagSteward (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

As a US editor, I certainly would not be advocating keeping an isolated quote of Mondavi in any article-except for maybe the Mondavi article itself. While I do think that NPOV requires due weight to the controversy and criticisms of Pinotage, I think it can be done without such a bizarre quote. While I do agree that Van Rensburg is an important and influential figure (and we do need to get an article on him), I think this quote would probably be of more lasting encyclopedic relevance in his article rather than in the Pinotage article itself. I am going to do some overall work on this article, focusing particularly on the NPOV side, and offer it up for review here on how balanced it is. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 15:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Criticism section

Update I've done some work on the article, including fashioning out a "Criticism" section. My overall concern was the WP:NPOV presentation and the weight of the criticism versus the rest of the article. I let the reliable sources be my guide and it seems while most sources make an effort to mention that there is some criticism, they rarely go beyond a few lines in saying what that criticism is about. To that extent, I think article is actually a little "unbalanced" in including more of that criticism then what the sources did. It seems that the story of Pinotage mostly exist on the ebb and flow of fashion with it rising in popularity as a "national treasure" for a few years and then being poo poo in favor of Cab & Shiraz in other years. In my opinion, the criticism section could be trim down and still convey the views of the critics in a balance proportion. That said, I am even more convinced now that the "child rape" comment is a bit overtop and not needed. It would be even more undue weight to the criticism since few, if any reliable sources, use this particular quote to "summarize" the criticism of Pinotage. While none of my sources even mention Van Rensburg, the online sources I saw only seem to mention it as an interesting side bit or summary of Van Rensburg's own isolated feelings about Pinotage rather than as some broad scope of how a segment of South African winemakers feel. I can see many good reasons for including it in an article about Van Rensburg himself, I just can't see an encyclopedic reason for it to be in this article. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 17:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree, the "child rape" comment would be more relevant in an article about the winemaker. I do find his opinion on Pinotage interesting in that an opinion from such a notable winemaker can be that extreme. Rarely are sentiments about an entire varietal expressed so strongly, and I don't recall any other instance of a mere grape inciting such vitriolic passion. Then again, if he's given to expressing strong opinions anyway (Fred Franzia, the maker of Charles Shaw wine comes to mind as a U.S. example), then just another strong opinion isn't as meaningful considering the source. -Amatulić (talk) 19:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Franzia is an excellent example. He can be a bit...extreme. I remember an interview where he said 90% of California winemakers are either crooks, frauds or hippies. :P While he is certainly a notable figure in California wine and it is certainly an interesting quote, I wouldn't advocate its inclusion in the California wine article. With the "child rape" quote, it is also a "far extreme" to the point of being almost WP:FRINGE. While criticism and disdain of Pinotage is not unheard of, the extreme and bizarre comparison to child rape is distinctly a minority view. I couldn't find any source, from any winemaker/wine writer listing a view point even scantily similar. The closest I could find was someone saying its a "crappy grape that makes wines that taste like banana flavored paint". Harsh criticisms, yeah but no where close to comparing a wine grape to child rape. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 19:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I object to the claim the Pinotage is South Africa's "signature" varietal. It most certainly is a South African grape, and is not grown in many other countries, but the best wines coming from RSA are not consistently Pinotage, year in year out. In fact until fairly recently, most 'tages were mediocre at best. "Signature" should refer to the best wines; Chenin Blanc has more of a claim to this category than Pinotage. I'd prefer the opening line to read ".. is a South African varietal" or thereabouts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.240.133.43 (talk) 14:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 19:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Pronunciation guide of limited usefulness

Directing persons to pronounce the last syllable of this varietal by using a word containing an "r" can lead to ridiculous results. An example is the press release for English singer Sade some years back; it always included the guide, "Shar-DAY". Radio and TV announcers across America, Canada, and many other English-speaking countries dutifully repeated the shortsighted example with a hard "r" and for years the hapless Sade had to appear on camera with well-intentioned interviewers addressing her as ShaRRR-Day. Now the mis-step is being repeated. The pronunciation guide is only helpful in cultural areas that do not sound the "r" in the first place so to include it in an international guide such as this is less than helpful; misleading really. I'm no linguist, but I would be better served if the phonetic example were more like "pinno-taj" or pinno-tazh" Comments? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.156.176 (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

In the early 21st century, several of South Africa's top producers have turned from focusing predominantly on Pinotage to using it more as a blending component, or have stopped using it at all.[11]

South Africa's top producers have turned from focusing predominantly on Pinotage to using it more as a blending component, or have stopped using it at all.[11]

The only supporting material for the above statement is an article by James Molesworth, a visiting American journalist.

In the referred article he does not offer any evidence to support this and names no 'top producers'.

He says

The region's top producers are conceding that Pinotage is not making the grade. They are turning more and more to Cabernet Sauvignon and Syrah for their reds, while sometimes using Pinotage in blends, where it can be an interesting component.

"I'm a great believer that this is the way for the future," says Engelbrecht, whose Rust en Vrede estate is moving toward producing just one red wine, a Cabernet-based blend.

The implication is that Rust en Vrede, by moving towards producing just a Cabernet based blend, has stopped using Pinotage. However, Rust en Vrede has never used Pinotage. They grow only Cab Sauv, Merlot and Shiraz. They used to grow and make Tinta Barocca but the last vintage of that before the vines were removed was 2000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.108.134 (talk) 12:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

"coffee styled pinotage"

What does this mean?Euonyman (talk) 13:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)