Talk:Neutrality of money
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Neutrality and super-neutrality
[edit]is neutrality and super-neutrality of money the same thing? i had both terms in a lecture but i couldn't grasp if there is any difference between the two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.44.163.84 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 23 February 2005 (UTC)
- definately not the saem thing, superneutral when the rate at which the money supply changes affects the price level, neutral when the level of the money supply affects price, sorry cant explain it better.Bluemoose 08:52, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Name change
[edit]I suggest changing the name of this article to Monetary neutrality. ~ UBeR 02:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- All the text books I've read call it the Neutrality of Money. --AtD 15:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
just bakwas —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.102.8.130 (talk) 07:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Counterfeiting
[edit]If the central bank can't affect the economy - why have it? Also why then is counterfeiting illegal? Hasn't money evolved from being a commonly traded commodity which use solves the coincidence of wants problem. Which means printing extra paper money and then using it, is taking something but not producing something in return (if the paper money isn't a claim on some commodity). How can that not distort the economy in favour of the money printer?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.196.109.220 (talk)
- The theory of Neutrality of Money says that the central bank cannot effect the real macro-economy by changing the amount of money in circulation, as money is just paper and coin, not factories and such. It does not make any claims on other methods central banks use to control the economy. Summed up, it basically means printing money doesn't make factories and highways appear out of nowhere. Any changes in aggregate demand caused by a change in the money supply are "neutralised" by changes in the price level. The theory implies there are no long run problems caused by inflation, thus only holds true in a closed economy.
- With regards to Counterfeiting, it's illegal because it unjustly transfers wealth to the Counterfeiter. Under the NoM theory, it doesn't change the size of the macro-economy in the long run, but could change the price level. --AtD 14:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the same happens when the Central Bank prints money - the money is not distributed equally to all people! It only gradually spreads throughout the economy. The effect is that the first receiving the money benefit twice: 1 when they use the money to buy the factors of production at old prices; 2 when they sell their products at new, post-inflation, prices. The idea of money neutrality is pure non-sense. The Central Bank is a legalized conterfeiter! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.121.5.166 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Citation overload
[edit]The 'evidence' section of this article contains the sentence 'Empirical studies have shown that money is neutral in the long-run.', followed by no fewer than 64 citations(!). This is utterly unnecessary. If such a result has been widely proved, it shouldn't be necessary to add so many citations to support it: a few citations to broad statements in reliable sources would be better than many citations to individual studies. At the moment, it breaks up the page and makes it harder to read, and paradoxically makes the sentence look less confidently stated due to the sheer number of citations the writer apparently felt the need to include. Robofish (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Citation
[edit]This is ridiculous.
I've moved the material here for reference.
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] [31][32][33] [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]
- References
- ^ "Money, Price Level and Output in the Chinese Macro Economy". Google. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ "Long-run Monetary Neutrality in China: Theories and Evidence-《Journal of Finance》2002年06期". En.cnki.com.cn. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ http://www.bundesbank.de/download/volkswirtschaft/dkp/2001/200114dkp.pdf
- ^ http://www.jstor.org/stable/2352700?&Search=yes&searchText=friedman&searchText=money&searchText=neutrality&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dmoney%2Bneutrality%2Bfriedman%26gw%3Djtx%26acc%3Don%26prq%3Dmoney%2Bneutrality%2Bfisher%2Bseater%26Search%3DSearch%26hp%3D25%26wc%3Don&prevSearch=&item=14&ttl=1551&returnArticleService=showFullText
- ^ "Emerald | Journal of Economic Studies | Testing the hypothesis of long-run money neutrality in the Middle East". Emeraldinsight.com. 28 April 2011. doi:10.1108/01443580710717192. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ http://mesharpe.metapress.com/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,4,4;journal,11,162;linkingpublicationresults,1:110911,1
- ^ http://www.imes.boj.or.jp/research/papers/english/me22-3-5.pdf
- ^ "Testing Long-Run Neutrality of Money in Thirteen Asian Developing Countries – PSAS IR". Psasir.upm.edu.my. 8 November 2010. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/99/11/9911jb.pdf
- ^ http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601238?&Search=yes&searchText=%22Ka-Fu+Wong%22&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dau%253A%2522Ka-Fu%2BWong%2522%26wc%3Don&prevSearch=&item=1&ttl=1&returnArticleService=showFullText
- ^ http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/eb/2006/volume5/EB-05E00006A.pdf
- ^ "MONEY, OUTPUT, AND INFLATION IN THE LONGER TERM: MAJOR INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES, 1880–2001 – HAUG – 2011 – Economic Inquiry – Wiley Online Library". Onlinelibrary.wiley.com. 26 April 2011. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ "Empirical Economics, Volume 21, Number 1". SpringerLink. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ Shelley, Gary & Wallace, Frederick. "Long run effects of money on real consumption and investment in the U.S". Ideas.repec.org. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)- ^ "Powered by Google Docs". Google. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ http://www.jstor.org/stable/1928168?&Search=yes&searchText=%22long-run+neutrality+of+money%22&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2522long-run%2Bneutrality%2Bof%2Bmoney%2522%26gw%3Djtx%26acc%3Don%26prq%3Dmoney%2Bneutrality%2Bfriedman%26Search%3DSearch%26hp%3D25%26wc%3Don&prevSearch=&item=1&ttl=57&returnArticleService=showFullText
- ^ http://web.econ.unito.it/bagliano/appmacro/bm_carnroch98.pdf
- ^ "Long-Run Neutrality, High Inflation, and Bank Insolvencies in Argentina and Brazil by Sang-Kun Bae, Ronald A. Ratti :: SSRN". Papers.ssrn.com. 7 December 2000. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ http://www.jstor.org/pss/1884277?
- ^ http://www2.selu.edu/orgs/ijae/Journal%204/IJAE%20MARCH%202006%20Shelley,%20Wallace%20FINAL%20AUGUST%207,%202006%20RV1.pdf
- ^ http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/capts/documents/AGReport528-P.pdf
- ^ http://203.72.2.115/Ejournal/3042080207.pdf
- ^ "Welcome to KERI". Keri.org. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tcavus/research/TARKAN_EC.pdf
- ^ http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/1994/94-011.pdf
- ^ http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/1006/1/243641567.PDF
- ^ http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1289&context=tepper&sei-redir=1#search=%22long-run%20neutrality%20money%20evidence%22L
- ^ http://www.banxico.org.mx/publicaciones-y-discursos/publicaciones/documentos-de-investigacion/banxico/%7B946C1861-A39E-AA85-6637-5DDF94A5E50B%7D.pdf
- ^ "Inflation uncertainty and unemployment: Some International evidence – page 3 | American Economist". Findarticles.com. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ "MACROECONOMIC GRANGER-CAUSAL DYNAMICS IN CROATIA: EVIDENCE BASED ON A VECTOR ERROR-CORRECTION MODELLING ANALYSIS". Google. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
{{cite web}}
: line feed character in|title=
at position 38 (help)- ^ "Long-run monetary neutrality and long-horizon regressions – Coe – 2004 – Journal of Applied Econometrics – Wiley Online Library". Onlinelibrary.wiley.com. 17 October 2002. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ "MONEY, OUTPUT, AND INFLATION IN THE LONGER TERM: MAJOR INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES, 1880–2001 – HAUG – 2011 – Economic Inquiry – Wiley Online Library". Onlinelibrary.wiley.com. 26 April 2011. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1995/lucas-lecture.pdf
- ^ http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1976/friedman-lecture.pdf
- ^ "Testing Long-Run Monetary Neutrality Propositions: Lessons from the Recent Research. – Free Online Library". Thefreelibrary.com. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ "Journal of Macroeconomics : Long-run neutrality in a fractionally integrated model". ScienceDirect. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ Frederick H. Wallace & Gary L. Shelley. "Long Run Neutrality and Superneutrality of Money: Aggregate and Sectoral Tests for Nicaragua". Ideas.repec.org. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/economic_perspectives/1979/ep_sep_oct1979_part1_gittings.pdf
- ^ "Monetary policy and the German ... – Jan Gottschalk – Google Books". Books.google.co.uk. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ "Monetary Theory Testing long". Cepr.org. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ http://web.up.ac.za/sitefiles/file/40/677/WP_2010_29.pdf
- ^ "Taylor & Francis Online :: Testing long-run neutrality of money: evidence from the UK – Applied Economics Letters – Volume 2, Issue 10". Tandfonline.com. 2 November 2006. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ "The Federal Reserve System: an ... – Rik W. Hafer – Google Books". Books.google.co.uk. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ "The Effects Of Monetary Policy On Real Output Evidence From West African Countries". Biblioteca.universia.net. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
- ^ http://www.jstor.org/stable/1914154
- ^ "Returning to Monetary Neutrality: The Ultimate Goal of Monetary Policy-《Journal of Guizhou College of Finance and Economics》2006年01期". En.cnki.com.cn. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
When a statement (like "Empirical studies have shown that money is neutral in the long-run") is cited, the way to go about it is to find a reliable secondary source which supports it. Citing a bunch of individual studies is completely improper, and risks violating the "no original research" policy. Gabbe (talk) 10:51, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
You say that, but now when I replaced it with a single textbook reference in which the secondary source overviews the evidence, it got removed because "That doesn't constitute evidence". Tails non-neutrality wins, heads neutrality loses? Or is a reference to an ADVANCED textbook going to be sufficient? 109.145.191.56 (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)