Jump to content

Talk:Zebrahead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Borrowed group description and members from Rolling Stone. Does this end the factual dispute? DJ Clayworth 17:04, 10 Nov 2003 (UTC)


I removed the following sentence (the second time, already removed the same sentence a couple weeks ago, but was reinserted):

the sound to the latest cd, MFZB, is one that would seemingly be influenced by Goldfinger with the punky rifts

Reasons I removed it:

  • It's not exactly elegant English.
  • MFZB is not the latest album anymore.
  • "the punky rifts" (hint: correct word is riff) are not exactly an invention of Goldfinger, so I think it's a bit far-fetched to call the album influenced by Goldfinger on that basis alone.

Ferkelparade π 17:35, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)


Wasn't Now Or Never a single too? At least, I'm sure it was released in the UK... Gavinatkinson 13:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I understand Zebrahead is a good band, but they didn't have to be featured on a Sonic game. How I see things now is that in order to appeal Sonic The Hedgehog to the youth, you need music that would appeal them. Apparently, rapcore is the only way to appeal the youth now-a-days. (Think of Knuckles' themes ever since Sonic Adventure 2.) However, as long as there's a punk/pop/rock background with the artist/group singing a theme to a character or the Sonic game itself, I will be satisfied. Rjsec4ever 22:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Should it be zebrahead?

[edit]

Every time it is shown on Albums, and in their logo in general, the Z is lowercase. Should the band be known as 'zebrahead' or 'Zebrahead'? the pillows use lowercase in their group name, so it's not unheard of. Should Wikipedia comply to the band's logo? 86.150.128.8 11:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at Zebrahead's official website: http://www.zebrahead.tv/ - the title of the page is an uppercase Z, as is every use of the word on the site. Despite their logo being all lowercase, the article name is correct. Ezenden 15:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ali on Guitar

[edit]

Since I'm not really firmilar with Wiki's requirements and rules I don't know if it's something that should be added, but I think it should be mentioned somewhere that Ali not only knows how to play the guitar but when Justin was in the band Ali played the guitar along side Greg in Justin's place while playing Playmate of the Year. Video Proof: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzqpgG8zE0o | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3fwsOonWw8

-Lord_Chaos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.186.140.129 (talk) 09:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References and cleanup

[edit]

While a good start, this article cites zero references and has a lot of NPOV language in it. While it's not at risk for deletion in its current state, it needs a lot of work. I also removed the members' roles from the infobox (according to the standards) and listed the "Current Members" section in a fashion more appropriate for band articles. Tdogg241 (talk) 00:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

[edit]

I removed some NPOV language in the page and changed some. The original reference language was "The band are now considered pop-punk, with excessive use of synthetised guitars and voices. Yuk."

It was changed to "The band are now considered pop-punk, with considerable use of synthetised guitars and voices."

-schmittr 1100 PST 15 August 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Schmittr (talkcontribs) 18:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

The track listing for Panty Raid shouldn't even be on this page, much less be there at all without a reference or two to supoprt it. I'm going to remove it for now. Any objections? [>{>Drakonis<}<] (talk) 05:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

[edit]

I'm going to add two more genres: "Pop punk" because it's the principal genre from Zebrahead and "Punk funk" because the early material was punk funk. Please don't remove this genres before posting an explanation here - Giusex27sc (talk) 23:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zebrahead - Justin Mauriello.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Zebrahead - Justin Mauriello.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 13 January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zebrahead was nominated at OC Music awards 2009

[edit]

Link: http://ocmusicawards.com/awards/2009-awards/ Shouldn't this be mentioned? They didn't win but they where nominated. SilentDan297 09:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SilentDan297 (talkcontribs)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Zebrahead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]