Talk:Banknotes of the Norwegian krone

Numismatics High‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway C‑class

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

(note: The part of the talk below here comes from Talk:100 kroner note)

The text in this entry is word for word the same as in the linked webpage and that page was this notice: © 2002 Norges Bank. Does the wikipedian who made this article have permission to use that text? --mav

The same way you put it in; just hit edit and delete most of the copyrighted text (it shouldn't really matter that the text is still in the history -- the history is not visible to search engines). Although the best thing to do is leave in the information but rewrite it in your own words. Facts and information are not copyrightable and I would love to see somebody try to sue us for using their facts and data when we present it in our own words. --mav

Removed it completely. What I meant was that I want to remove a reproduction of the 200 kroner note that I found at http://www.fys.uio.no/plasma/english/texts/birkeland/ and uploaded as /upload/8/8f/NOK200front.png /upload/8/8f/NOK200back.png

-- Ole

Unless the nation of Norway itself is claiming copyright I don't think any simple scan can have a unique and separate copyright. The same is true for any text scaned from a public domain book --just because the book was scanned in last year doesn't mean the the resulting text is not also public domain. -- mav

Uncertain whether Norges Bank does claim copyright on the notes. But I added the original note on reproduction, that I now removed! I don't want to be on thin ice. I'm going to give them a call later. -- Ole

Also, the article titles (all the Norwegian currency denominations, so it seems) should be different. "Kroner" is the Norwegian plural, but English is "krones" and the Swedes and Danes also have the same name for their currency and the same notes, so the title should be something like "Norwegian 100 krones (bank)note". Jheijmans

No, the English plural is either krone or kroner. 84.49.32.115 (talk) 08:42, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed in the Norwegian notes and Norwegian coins nodes. Thank you!

-- These pages should follow the example by Euro banknotes.

Could someone fix the current pictures in the article please?? Make thumbnails etc. Rather intrusive at the moment... -Antwelm 10:38, 2005 May 24 (UTC)--

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Banknotes of the Norwegian krone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110810204819/http://www.norges-bank.no/en/notes-and-coins/statistics/ to http://www.norges-bank.no/en/notes-and-coins/statistics/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New banknote series (2017–)

The new 100-krone and 200-krone banknotes were put into circulation on 30 May 2017, while the 50-krone and 500-krone banknotes are expected to come into circulation by the end of 2019. Lastly, the 1000-krone banknote is planned to enter circulation in the course of autumn 2019. The banknotes from the previous series, which are still valid for a year, until 30 May 2018, have already been uploaded to Commons. The previous banknote series was uploaded along with links to the Norwegian Bank's guidelines and a statement saying "© Norges Bank - Used with permission". Is it possible to upload the new 100-krone and 200-krone banknote with specimen overprint under the same use rationale?

New banknote series General information (in English)
When will the banknotes be launched? Launch dates
Guidelines for the use of Norwegian banknotes and coin designs (see 2b: Reproduction in electronic media)

Kind regards — Neuraxıs ^talk ^- ^email 13:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, these were in fact not uploaded to Commons; they were uploaded locally to the English Wikipedia. Nonetheless, I’m wondering if they can be uploaded to Commons, with specimen overprint and resolution lower than 72 dpi. Would that satisfy fair use policy in this case? — Neuraxıs ^talk ^- ^email 23:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]