User talk:Cats rule

Wikipedia:WikiProject Cat breeds

I noted that you are one of the listed members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Cat breeds. That project has seemed to go dormant lately, although my recent joining has reactivated it. I was wondering if you would think it might be a good idea to merge the two projects together. I acknowledge that the scope of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Cats is a lot broader than that of the cat breeds project, but it does at least seem to have gotten a fair amount of new members lately. Also, given its breadth, it could easily take on the duties of the Cat breeds project now that it has become dormant. I would be very interested in hearing from you on either project page whether you think the two projects should merge or not. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 19:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok with me.Cats rule 15:12, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a copy of the first newsletter of the Cats WikiProject, mentioning the proposed merger. I'm sending it out to all of the members of the Cat Breeds Project so that they can know a little about the group with which there is an existing merger proposal. We would welcome any and all comments about the project, and the newsletter, from members of both groups. Right now, I'm waiting on a couple of more responses from the Cat breeds members before we actually create a new subproject on breeds. Anyway, thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 16:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bicolor oriental shorthair

We appreciate your contributions, such as Bicolor oriental shorthair, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.avidpets.com/Catbreeds/oriental.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Bicolor oriental shorthair. Then you should do one of the following:

Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Bicolor oriental shorthair where we can find that note; or
Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Bicolor oriental shorthair.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! --Interiot 20:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

looks like your avidpets infringed on the cfa copyright, since that is where i paraphrased from.Cats rule 21:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

breed history

Hi,

Glad you're working on these pages. I saw that you removed the Baroness / intro to the US history of the Oriental Shorthair. Some of that was already there before I worked on the pages, and some I edited. I thought it was interesting, and personally like having individual names attached to histories rather than simply organizational actions. I'm not returning the text at this point, but thought I'd raise it with you to get the reason you deleted that content. --LQ 13:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I started off this article from the perspective of the CFA and using the information that this registry provides. If you read the CFA article on the Havana Brown, you will understand the persepective. I started working on this from the perspective of CFA, since that is the registry i use for my osh breeing program. i am finding their infomation to be sketchy where the history is concerned.

i think this is largely because in some countries, havana brown is a color of osh. in other countries, it is a seperately recognized breed. it is not disputed that the history of the Baroness is the history of the Havana Brown breed as recognized by CFA. It is disputed that this is the history of the oriental shorthair, since the oriental shorthair program was began for all self colored cats, not just the brown.

As I am learning more from experts, the Oriental Shorthair or Self Colored Siamese is not a created breed. It was imported from Siam with the Siamese. Given that the gene that restricts colors to the points is recessive, it makes sense that most of these cats were not point restricted. these cats were the solid ferals of siam and they are not a man made breed.

the osh was shown in england in the 1890's. the fancy at that time was more interested in color pattern than pedigree. during ww2, pedigree cats were bred with anything to keep the genetics. a lot of the breeds were bred together to preserve genetics. post ww2, everything had to be sorted out again. this is where the history of the breed is disputed.

A friend sent me the paper written by the breeding experiments done that eventually produced the havana brown. i don't have it with me. i would love to put it on the wikipedia, but i don't quite grasp the copyright issues with doing that. i would love to share it with you if you are interested, but i only have page one. people are digging into their scrapbooks to help update this article.

not to worry, i have some very experienced oriental breeders helping with the page. some of these people were involved in the original creation of the breed and getting the breed accepted into cfa. at any rate, this is going to take a while to unravel. if you would like to particpate in the discuttion, there is a yahoo group Oriental_Fanciers. The discussion is going on there, amongst other places.

this is going to be a bit like making sausage. the process is going to be ugly, but the end result is going to be wonderful.Cats rule 16:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to see the article; if you have it online you can send me the URL. Or, you could email it to me at lqonline at lquilter.net . I'm a copyright attorney & feel pretty comfortable saying that this limited use would be clearly fair use, since we're working on a research piece, and are not republishing for profit etc. More info about copyright & fair use at http://fairusenetwork.org/ which is a site I work on. ... As for the breed history, after I read the article maybe we can think of ways to talk about the breed history. Its natural origins & then its pick-up & refinement by cat asociations, perhaps, as separate topics. --LQ 17:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the article is by Hargreaves and titled something like "a breeding experiment". what i have is a digital scan of the first page. ont of the guys helping out with the history actually had this article in a scrapbook. other such stuff is being collected and discussed. eventually i need to carry myself to the library and search for the articles. some of them have some pretty heavy duty genetics stuff, which i find to be utterly fascinating. these women collected empirical information and formed theories that are being proven with today's dna research on cat coat/color.

what is your interest in oriental shorthairs? do/did you breed them? do you own them? do you show them?Cats rule 18:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly, I'm just an aleurophile. My partner & I have 5 cats, including, right now, 3 OSHs (2 are sealpoints, one is a tabby). Her parents were in the cat-breeding & catshow community so I got a little bit interested in that history; as I said, what interests me in the history is the individuals & personalities, more than the associations. I should acknowledge that her parents are the Marksteins in the original article, and their stories of the personalities & politics in the cat world got me interested initially in that background. Probably, what I would love to see sometime would be an article that delved into the history of the organizations and the politics and personalities of them.

I am very interested in the genetics, in part because my partner is a geneticist. But the part that is fascinating to me is the "amateur science" you mention: That people in the cat world just gathered a lot of data and made hypotheses. That's another aspect that I think would be worthy of its own article. --LQ 19:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please write an article on the Marksteins, et. all. Seems you have a good perspective. Then we can merge it in when the "experts" finish discussing the topic. BTW, page one of the Hargreaves article is listed in the references. If you can find the entire article, i would love it. And other similar articles. You should join the Oriental Fanciers yahoo group. Seems you could add a lot to the current discussion.

Image:Jacob_lucky_charms.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jacob_lucky_charms.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please feel free to delete this image Cats rule (talk) 17:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Kay080616 2.jpg

Image:Kay080616 2.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:BlackWhiteOrientalShorthair. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:BlackWhiteOrientalShorthair]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:20070716 brandi.jpg

Image:20070716 brandi.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Oriental Shorthair cat Brandi.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Oriental Shorthair cat Brandi.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moves of cat articles

Hello, I moved back 4 cat articles from your unilateral and weird titling. If you think that current titles do not fit to contents, would you first open a discussion on its talk or on WikiProject Cat first? Thank.--Caspian blue 06:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oriental Shorthair cat Brandi.jpg

You have included this file to en.wikipedia.org. Obviously another user has transferred it to Wikimedia Commons. What i miss is a description of the cat itself: name (preferrably pedigree name), DoB, colour, possibly name of parents and so on. It would be of great help to get these information. Harald wehner (talk) 16:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trey tooney 082005.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trey tooney 082005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trey food.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trey food.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ebony smoke and white oriental short-hair being judged at a CFA cat show.jpg

The file File:Ebony smoke and white oriental short-hair being judged at a CFA cat show.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]