Talk:Seer Green

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Does Jordans not merit its own page? It is culturally and historically distinct from Seer Green...

Currently it's a redirect to this page. If you feel you have enough info to make it into an article in its own right then yes you can edit it, no problem. Just click on Jordans, then at the top of the page will be a message (saying 'Redirected from Jordans'), click on that Jordans link and then edit the page as normal. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 16:59, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Im not changing this as im not sure how the parish/parish council are linked (Though i assume the same?) and my intepretation may be wrong, but to me the last section about being part of CSG's Parish also suggests that Jordans is now seperated from Chalfont St Giles Parish -- (Jordans is definutely still under Chalfont St Giles Parish Council). Could this be clearer or am I just misreading? T.pearce 16:51, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it has its own article now, Jordans is unique and needs its own page. A redirect to Seer Green would be misleading, they only share a railway station that isn't actually in either. It has Beaconsfield post code and is under Chalfopnt st Giles parish that doesn't make it any less distinctive SqueakBox 18:09, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Seer Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930235906/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10157780&c_id=10001043 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10157780&c_id=10001043

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]