Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KUA

non-notable bureaucratic thing Salasks 01:35, Aug 2, 2004 (UTC)

• Keep, just barely. It's a) a good, well-written short article b) about a very, very marginally notable utility. I don't think "the 6th largest utility in Florida" is very impressive. (Do we have articles on the five larger ones?) "KUA’s 289 employees serve approximately 58,000 customers" so presumably there are approximately 58,289 people to whom it is important, although I don't think that's a very strong argument. [[User:Dpbsmith|dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:52, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Move to the expanded name. The TLA is improper naming. Geogre 03:45, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Article is copyvio, I've marked it as such. Can the VfD lister remove it from the VfD page if in agreement please? - TB 08:19, Aug 2, 2004 (UTC)
• I agree, though even if it's not cv I still think it should be deleted. But I'm not sure how to go about removing comments from VfD. Aren't these comments 'sacred' or 'protected' or something? Salasks 15:39, Aug 2, 2004 (UTC)
  • The comments on this page will persist, but I've unlinked it from the main VfD page now to keep it as tidy as possible. - TB 13:12, Aug 3, 2004 (UTC)