Talk:The Daily Telegraph

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Daily Telegraph article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Premature obituaries and criticism section

The Telegraph was founded 168 years ago in 1855. The "Premature obituaries" subsection in the "Criticism" section lists three examples in The Telegraph's history of publishing premature obituaries. The only source for this is a 2001 article by a journalist in The Telegraph itself. Is this really "criticism"? Many media outlets in many countries do occasionally print mistakes or occasionally publish premature obituaries, often due to a technical or human error. In my view the "Premature obituaries" subsection is WP:UNDUE in the criticism section, as apart from the journalist in The Telegraph mentioning three mistakes made in different years, there is no other reference to state The Telegraph was criticised for these errors.

In the subsection "Accusation of antisemitism" there is only one person, Owen Jones of The Guardian, who has made the accusation of antisemitism against The Telegraph for publishing articles which have espoused a Cultural Marxism / antisemitic conspiracy theory. Apart from an op-ed / Guardian column from Jones, there is no other person listed in a reference who has accused The Telegraph of antisemitism. In my view, the "Accusation of antisemitism" subsection may also be WP:UNDUE given the absence of criticism regarding this from anybody in a reference apart from Owen Jones.

Guidelines at WP:CRIT also state: "In most cases separate sections devoted to criticism, controversies, or the like should be avoided in an article because these sections call undue attention to negative viewpoints." Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"デイリー・テレグラフ" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect デイリー・テレグラフ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 9 § デイリー・テレグラフ until a consensus is reached. Certes (talk) 18:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]