Talk:Conservative Party of New York State

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American / Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Does the description need to include "minor"? ~ Dpr 07:55, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"...their lack of support in 1989 was one important factor in Giuliani losing that year." I would like to see a citation for this -- it's a pretty bold statement. Grandmasterka 02:23, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What are Giuliani's "fusion" campaigns? --SeekingOne 13:19, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Probably referring to the fact that he was endorsed by the Liberal party (when you are on more than one ballot line, that's referred to as "fusion").--Inonit 14:19, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

GOP needs a link

The word GOP occurs twice in the article, yet neither of these occurences is a link to an article explaining what GOP means. I do know what it means, but practically no other Europeans do. --Peter Knutsen 11:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguated American Conservative Party from CPNYS

Owing to the current events in the 23rd district of New York, many reporters in the media are referring to the CPNYS simply as "the Conservative Party." This is quite understandable, but the American Conservative Party has seen a recent influx of members who are confusing it with the CPNYS. Since the ACP has no article here (yet, but I think this may establish the need for one), I have edited a few instances of "Conservative Party" to the full name, added the abbreviation CPNYS, and added a sentence to state that the two organizations are separate and not affiliated. Full disclosure: I am the Secretary of the American Conservative Party. We are not seeking to directly profit from the media and public confusion. in this matter. Crimsonsplat (talk) 22:50, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Party Registration Citation

The article stating that the Conservative Party has the 4th total, does not include Libertarians in its comparission. Looking to verify where they fit in the mix I see the ciation like has absoluletly nothing to do with what it is supposed to be citing. A corrective action needs to be made or this section needs to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.212.213.41 (talk) 22:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

membership

I voted yesterday and the Conservatives are absolutely NOT "line C" on the ballot anymore, despite what they might wish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.67.32.161 (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 update needed

needs 2016 update. Conservative Party candidate Trump won nationally, lost new york, but i can't find vote totals for the conservative ballot line. - robbin stewart — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.90.140.164 (talk) 17:45, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Local Assembly and Senate Election Results Need "New York Red Book" Access

Long story short, the figures present on Our Campaigns are simply not up to snuff when it comes to properly breaking down the vote by Party; there are far too many cases where only the candidate figures are provided, and that in turn significantly distorts the final totals when it comes to how many votes the Party received in a race or even just whether a candidate was endorsed. Unfortunately the New York Elections Board only provides figures from 1998 onwards, meaning that the whole period from 1962 to 1996 is left literally on the books, in this case the New York Red Books. As a resident of Massachusetts I don't have ready access to these books, and it doesn't seem as if many of them have made it online unlike the Wisconsin Blue Books. To complete that section we are going to need a New York City native who is willing to track them down locally, scan the relevant pages from each volume; I personally can take care of the long-form math. --Ariostos (talk) 03:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Native American rights

Why is Native Americansi forgotten 47.226.4.187 (talk) 16:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]