Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/John Gohde/Evidence
As John's claims against me were explicitly rejected, and as I have already cited his repeated insistence that I am megalomaniacal as a personal attack, I request that an arbitrator remove John's personal attack-filled allegations from the evidence page. Snowspinner 19:29, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
- "Snowspinner's megalomaniacal presentation of evidence was so megalomaniacal", no less, not to mention the paragraph below. I say leave the stuff in; he's digging his own grave.-Ashley Pomeroy 20:56, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
As no decisions have been made in this case, yet I move to have all of Snowspinner's megalomaniacal rantings removed both from talk and from the evidence. I would like to for the arbitrators to add Snowspinner's above megalomaniacal interpretations of my simple replies to his megalomaniacal evidence charges as being a personal attack should be included as part of the evidence against him. Megalomaniacal is the word that best describes just who this admin is. -- John Gohde 22:24, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/John Gohde/Evidence page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/John Gohde/Evidence" page.
