Talk:Anovulation

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women's Health Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Anovulation.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 21 September 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anitaqualls, Appiah.d.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak ovulation

I have been trying to get pregnant for a long time. I seem to be in great health and my menstrual cycle is regular. I finally went to the doctor and had a check up, blood was drawn and tested. After a few weeks the doctor finally got a hold of me and told me that my ovulation is weak. My question is, is there such a weak ovulation?? If there is, can it be treated?? thanks.

There are lots of causes of not ovulating. Some are more easily treated than others. Good luck. alteripse 07:48, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You should order the book, Taking charge of your Fertility by Toni Weschler. It gives lots of info about how to track your cycles and information about problems that can occur...not as vague as "weak ovulation". I've been using it to not get pregnant right now. Good luck.

References

This article needs one or more references to cover the content, added the tag. --FloNight 04:04, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Analgesic#Unreferenced. chocolateboy 11:42, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anovulation after menarche

Why is there no mention of the fact that anovulation is common in the first two years after menarche? Dyslexic agnostic 15:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because no one has a reliable source for that information. Can you provide one?

Pregnancy

Is it possible to have menstrual cycles while pregnant? I Swedish teenage girl claimed to have had normal periods an thus not realizing that she was pregnant until it was too late for abortion.

2009-06-15 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anovulation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120909004107/http://hkcog.obg.cuhk.edu.hk:80/docs/college_guidelines/Use_of_Gonadotrophins_Revised_2003.txt to http://hkcog.obg.cuhk.edu.hk/docs/college_guidelines/Use_of_Gonadotrophins_Revised_2003.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anovulation Work Plan

Aspect of work plan Space for notes Article chosen Anovulation Why this one? Include WP rating scale? How fit with your interests. Other details as desired We chose anovulation because the differential and mechanisms of the disease processes which cause anovulation are applicable information to understand for our exam and as future physicians. WP rating = mid priority, start quality You WP editing team (up to 3) Anita Qualls, Donna Appiah, Anne Sommer Initial Analysis of the article Lack of framework and organization, limited info on causes of anovulation and treatment options. Overall organization, what changes Updating causes, diagnosis and treatments of anovulation What will you add? WHO classification system, common causes (genetics vs lifestyle etc), secondary vs primary causes, up to date statistics What will you remove? dated statistics, confusing language, What will you augment? We will expand the ‘causes’, ‘diagnosis’ and ‘treatments’ sections to create a comprehensive differential of what can cause anovulation. What will you decrease coverage of? We will not decrease coverage of topics after there is limited details in this article to begin with Roles in the project. List members and planned roles. Possible roles include: Overseer/amalgamator/reconciler Readability editor Researcher Editor/writer-what sections will each do? Linker, for larger groups consider some one who will check the articles linked to make sure that the linked material is sufficient and accurate Images/graphics Other? Donna- writer for causes section, readability, graphics?

Anne - writer for diagnosis section, linker

Anita - writer for treatment sections, overseer/submitting info Team coordination plan: Options might include, regular team meetings, sharing calendars, setting up a place to keep your work in order to edit collaboratively (this might be the sandbox, or it might be Box or DropBox or Slack, or other) Group text google docs to edit collaboratively WIP presenter whole group — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anitaqualls (talk • contribs)

Wonderful. Thanks for choosing this topic, and I'm looking forward to seeing your work. If you like, you can make a list of the sources you're planning to use and post the list here for feedback from experienced editors. Identifying good sources is usually the trickiest part of writing medical content on Wikipedia. By the way, please add four tildes (~~~~) after your comments to make the wiki system add a signature for you. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 18:12, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Fantastic job on this page! I think the additions you all have made have really helped flesh out the causes, diagnostic tests, and treatments for anovulation. Some things to consider adding would be perhaps a brief discussion about the mechanism associating PCOS with elevated BMI and insulin resistance. That may make some of the weight-based/metformin recommendations in the treatment section make more sense. Also, it may be worthwhile to include some of the clinical signs of hyperprolactinemia that a patient may be able to notice on their own. But, overall, super solid work! Trisynapse (talk) 00:55, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]