Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Zito

Article Andrew Zito listed on WP:VFD July 7 to July 13 2004, was deleted as a recreation of an already deleted page through the vfd process. Discussion:

vanity page of User:Andrew Zito. Previously moved to the user namespace, has recently be posted back into the article space by what is probably a sockpuppet account. Maximus Rex 03:53, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity page of an abusive self-promoting user. older≠wiser 04:02, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Don't delete and address the subject matter on the merits (if that is possible as you appear to be acting like book burning fascists) not your egos when you speak of vanity (you have not to date addressed many issues on the merits of contents but arbitrarily unfairly treat contents on the basis of your pleasure not value)Richard Sorge
  • Note: Richard Sorge is a possible sockpuppet of user:Andrew Zito. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Andrew Zito -- Chris 73 | Talk 15:16, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. No evidence of notability, reads like a vanity page or a joke. This was deleted once before, and may possibly qualify for speedy delete on that basis, but I'm not sure whether it went through the full VfD process then. So let's do so now. Andrewa 04:45, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• This article has been voted for deletion and deleted according to policy, and can be speedily deleted any time it is recreated. —Stormie 05:08, Jul 7, 2004 (UTC)
  • And it has been promptly deleted. i vote to keep it deleted. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 07:44, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity. Ambivalenthysteria 05:12, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: vanity. —No-One Jones 05:22, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)