User talk:132.205.45.148

Thanks

Thanks for your work on Category:Star Wars vehicles - but why the distinction between "starcraft", "spaceships" and "starfighters"? ··gracefool |☺ 08:13, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Okay, I've fixed it (removed the empty "starcraft" category). ··gracefool |☺ 03:54, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Olympic Games links

Hi there Anon IP 132.205.45.148,

Every Summer and Winter Olympic Games has a footer down the bottom, that looks like this:

Which as you can see, contains links to Summer Olympic Games, Winter Olympic Games, and all years for each summer and winter games. For this reason, links to years' games within the article itself are redundant.

It is still worth putting a link to the corresponding years Paralympic Games article in the See also section, as I notice you have been doing.

btw - great work on the specific items of history (particularly Canadian) on other Olympic articles!

By the way, if you register an account and log in, you will be able to attribute your edits to your own account, not an anonymous IP address as you are now.

-- Chuq 04:32, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

List of numbers

Hi. I personally don't think your changes to the List of numbers article (adding powers of a thousands where there were powers of a million before) are adding anything useful to the article, and are serving to make it more confusing. I would rather have one or the other, but not both, and I think the powers of a million are easier to understand. I left a comment on the talk page, but I thought that an outright revert would be a bit harsh, so I'll give you an opportunity to comment before proceeding with the revert. See the article's talk page for discussion, or my talk page if you wish to talk with me specifically. --[[User:Ardonik|Ardonik(talk)]] 02:26, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)

Dis-ambiguation messages

FYI dis-ambiguation messages are supposed to be footers, not headers. 66.245.17.89 00:55, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Template:Japanese

A table for Japanese has been previously suggested. It received an overwhelmingly negative response from Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_for_Japan-related_articles#Template_for_articles_Japanese_terms. You might want to refrain from using this template that you created because there is a chance that it might be deleted. —Tokek 22:47, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

D'n'D

Because it isn't about Dungeons & Dragons

I agree with you, but most other people say you should wait until it has been deleted, and then creat a redirect. If you want to redirect again I won't revert it. I Lov E Plankton 18:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD & RfA

What you suggest was precisely the content of AfD before the 19:29, 5 May 2006 deletion. I don't personally believe that cross-namespace redirects are as harmfule as some people pretend they are, but I don't think it is really an issue worth fighting over. I suggest you try to argue with Cyde, who deleted the redirect, if you think it is worth the hassle. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 01:01, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prod removal

Your reason for your recent removal of my prod on TWYM indicates to me that you might have been looking for the transwikied definition in Wiktionary's mainspace, instead of the Transwiki: pseudo-namespace, where meta dictates it should be copied. FYI, the transwikied definition is at wikt:Transwiki:TWYM, and I have re-added the prod. Hope that clears up any confusion that might have arisen. TheProject 01:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PROPOSALS

Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_May_12#PROPOSAL: All Wikipedian User categories should have "Wikipedian" as part of their name — CARRIED

Legend of Zelda Categories

Hi. I noticed that you have taken part in the recent discussion about the future of the Legend of Zelda categories. I am just leaving this note to let you know that Proposal 1 (merging all game sub-categories) has been successful, and I will be relisting it at CfD later today. Of the renaming proposals, only option 7 appears to have gained a consensus in support. However, I am going to leave that discussion open a few more days as we have had a related proposal (No. 11) that has not yet been discussed. Please use this time to consider whether you wish to support or oppose the new proposal, or in any way change your previous votes. I will be reassessing the situation at about 18:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC). Road Wizard 20:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stormdrain

I moved Stormdrain to Stormdrain (band). The redirect did not work because they do not refer to the same subject. Thank.--John Lake 01:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re Transwiki:Musictionary:John, Elton/Albums/One Night Only

what is a transwiki, and what does it have to do in Wikipedia namespace? --Alvestrand 19:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Places in Turkish-Occupied Cyprus

Thanks for moving the PROD of this category to a CfD. However, I was wonering if you'd consider a couple of suggestions:

Let the editor who made the propoal know it is being converted to an XfD, simply as a courtesy.
Include an edit summary indicating what was done, as suggested in WP:PROD and WP:EDIT#Introduction. Leaving an edit summary makes it more clear and less ambiguous what the intent of the edit is.

Again, thanks for rectifying my mistake. It's good to see the spirit of cooperation expressed so well.

Move request for Candidate planets

Re: your move request at Talk:Candidate planets, you also need to add an entry on the WP:RM page itself or it will likely never be closed. Let me know if you have questions. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Info note

A template you created, Template:Info note, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you have no objections regarding the deletion, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 18:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Mormon education

Category:Mormon education, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –

CfD nomination of Category:Mormon universities and colleges

Category:Mormon universities and colleges, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –

Article for deletion/Battlestar Wiki (3rd nom.)

The Battlestar Wiki aritlce has been nominated for deletion for the third time. Feel free to add your comments to the corresponding discussion.--DrWho42 (talk) 04:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Macross and Robotech

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Macross and Robotech, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Macross and Robotech has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Macross and Robotech, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Christina Desforges

I have nominated Christina Desforges, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Desforges. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. KelleyCook (talk) 12:26, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ana Arce

The article Ana Arce has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, fails WP:ARTIST

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Chemical images

Category:Chemical images, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Leyo 18:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Water ice

Category:Water ice, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 13:09, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Wunderwaffen

Category:Wunderwaffen, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:RMlink

Template:RMlink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Universities and colleges by association

Category:Universities and colleges by association, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:48, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Education by religious affiliation

Category:Education by religious affiliation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020 02:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Canadian Paralympic Athletics Championships

The article Canadian Paralympic Athletics Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No worthwhile content but a ref to 2005 Canadian Paralympic Athletics Championships

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 21:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Water ice has been nominated for discussion

Category:Water ice, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Universal Century vehicles has been nominated for discussion

Category:Universal Century vehicles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:09, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ALON ™ listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ALON ™. Since you had some involvement with the ALON ™ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Doctor Who planets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Doctor Who planets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Doctor Who planets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 02:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"ALON ®" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ALON ® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#ALON ® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"ALON®" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ALON® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#ALON® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:38, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lieutenant Boomer

The article Lieutenant Boomer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable character, sourced only to wikis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lieutenant Boomer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lieutenant Boomer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lieutenant Boomer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Count Baltar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Count Baltar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Count Baltar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuicoleJR (talk) 16:11, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Universities and colleges by type has been nominated for renaming

Category:Universities and colleges by type has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 17:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[WW1-1] Cancelled due to World War I

[WW2-2] Cancelled due to World War II

[COVID2021-3] Postponed to 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic

[a]

[b]

[c]