Talk:Nerstrand, Minnesota

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

No racism

It is a bit strange to observe that someone seems to think it is useful/necessary to write:

“The racial makeup of the city is 97.85% White, 0.00% African American, 1.72% Native American, 0.43% Asian, 0.00% Pacific Islander, 0.00% from other races, and 0.00% from two or more races. 1.72% of the population are Hispanic or Latino of any race.”

And if so: Why using the expression “White”. Shouldn’t it be “European Americans”? And “Asian” has to be changed to “Asian Americans”. Further “Pacific Islander Americans”. The mess is complete.

There is one human race. Hispanic and Latino or whatever, we are of the same kind. You can sort us in religious believes, language, age, address, even property. But not race. That is why I am removing this.

Arnejohs 14:48, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Your edit summary indicates that you corrected an error, but here you're saying something different. I appreciate your sentiment, but racial distinctions do exist. If your only rationale for removing the info is your personal opinion that "we are of the same kind," then I think it would be appropriate to replace the statistics you deleted. If they are demonstrably inaccurate, let's correct them. Cribcage 15:21, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. To your question: Yes and no. Yes, it was an error there. The error could have been corrected by exchanging race with population. That was in fact my first thought. But have a look at the numbers. "0% African Americans 0% Pacific Islanders". Why select this information and not all the other things which also not are there. In addition we have the problem of inconsistency pointed out above. I felt uncomfortable of selecting out this information to be provided. But I regret writing "we are of the same kind". Not because it's untrue, but because it caused confusing. I am sorry. Arnejohs 15:59, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

You make an excellent point about those zero statistics. My guess is the information was cut & pasted directly from a database, which would explain the zeroes and the poor grammar. But I agree with you: There is no reason for those races to be listed, if they are not present in the population.

"White" versus "European Americans" is simply a matter of common usage. "White" and "African American" are the usual terms, so they seem appropriate to me. But if you think changing "White" to "Caucasian" would make sense, give it a try. Cribcage 16:25, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

The demographics data was retained from that added by Rambot. A quick check of other articles on cities and towns will reveal similar data with similar verbiage. I thought about editing it out when I made the other changes, but didn't. UninvitedCompany 03:13, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nerstrand, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to https://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]