Talk:Mount Olivet Cemetery (Halifax, Nova Scotia)

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Nova Scotia Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2005 comment

According to the naming convention, shouldn't this article be renamed Mount Olivet Cemetery (Halifax)? Rlquall 13:52, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

2015 comment

I am querying the CWGC over its figures for war graves in the cemetery. A count in their own website reveals a total of 68 (not 78) named dead, 58 from WWI and 10 from WWII. (There are no double-entered records as would be the case for those who served under an alias different from real name.)Cloptonson (talk) 11:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn my query and accept the figures of 78 dead - I miscounted! However, the figure for WWI dead should read 68. I will correct that.Cloptonson (talk) 17:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]