Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Sim
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 21:40, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Patent silliness. Denni☯ 01:13, 2005 May 21 (UTC)
- Speedy delete this total nonsense. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:47, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 02:30, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Vanity. Harro5 02:40, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
- I agree, this is speediable --nixie 04:41, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Little or no content. Sjakkalle 11:46, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hmm.. Red Moon , I think the author is mistaken . It must be Planet Mars . (poor joke) --IncMan 11:49, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: Just a note of comment, though. There is no rule about speedy deleting things on VfD, but I'd like to encourage admins on VfD to not speedy delete on the first day of a VfD. 99% of the time, the article will still be a heaping pile of speedy delete material the 2nd day, but we don't want to kill a potential article. I also agree with Denni: it really isn't quite a criterion #1 speedy delete (and I'm as trigger happy with criterion #1 as anyone around, I think). I'd kill it as a hoax/prank. Geogre 20:57, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete beginning of a fiction novel. DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:49, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not factual. may be a joke, but in any case not appropriate for wikipedia as it stands. DES 17:04, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.