Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cfmb
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. – ABCD 21:01, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Radio station that does not establish notability. I'm beginning to treat these like middle schools. -- Riffsyphon1024 09:11, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete unless radio station can establish notability.Keep, article seems to be developing appropriately. Tygar 09:14, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)- Keep and move to CFMB or something similar. Unlike middle schools, radio stations are rarely vanity pages. —Korath (Talk) 16:13, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. — RJH 00:21, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, article does not establish notability, stationcruft. Megan1967 01:41, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Move to proper title CFMB and keep. I've expanded the article a bit; more expansion is possible with additional research. I believe it's generally accepted that broadcast stations merit articles, as long as they're properly written. Bearcat 03:53, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Move to proper title CFMB and keep. --Spinboy 03:56, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and move to proper title. All licensed radio stations are notable. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 05:34, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. Sepper 17:17, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep; while I disagree that all radio stations are notable (e.g. very low-power localized ones aren't), this one is significant. Radiant! 10:52, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. —Mar·ka·ci:2005-03-7 23:15 Z
- Keep. Appears to be worthy of an article. -- James Teterenko (talk) 02:46, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.