Jump to content

Talk:Jefferson County, Alabama

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talkcontribs) 19:12, 1 October 2002 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Jefferson County Seal.png

[edit]

File:Jefferson County Seal.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Bond Controversy

[edit]

What is the difference between "default" and "technical default?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.61.151.128 (talk) 03:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'll quote from the Birmingham News: "Technical default means the county has violated terms of the swap agreements with investment banks, including JP Morgan Chase. A payment default occurs if the county discontinues payments to the banks, which has not happened so far." [1] --Dystopos (talk) 04:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sewer bond portion of the article says, "The debt structure now was such that there was no way that 700,000 people could pay it back over 30 years. The job could have been done for somewhere between $1.2 billion and $1.5 billion but shouldn't have cost 3.2 billion. Those selling the bonds weren't interested in whether they could be repaid as they would have moved on." This seems to be a paraphrase of comments made by the current head of the Sewer Commission from a 2011 BBC radio interview, but it reads like a statement of fact, perhaps due to the lack of quotation marks. Suggest the author of this part of the article edit it to make it clear that these are the views of one player in the controversy, one with a vested position. I suspect the comments are accurate, but.... Opus131 (talk) 23:11, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Debt per resident

[edit]

Rolling Stone says $4,800, not $7,000.[2] -- AnonMoos (talk) 19:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sewer Construction

[edit]

"Much of this work was awarded to inexperienced companies, many of which have since been convicted of bribery, along with several county officials."

While there have been questions in news reports regarding some engineering work, there was never any report or accusation that contracting companies which repaired, rehabilitated and built sewers under the 1996 Consent Decree were "inexperienced companies." On the contrary, even in the cases of those who were convicted of bribery, court records indicate that a strict qualification process was in place for the cured-in-place sewer rehab work, for which only three companies in the U.S. were found qualified to supply the materials and oversee the process. Additionally, court testimony proved that all construction done by the companies on trial was completed in a competent and timely manner. Bamacartag (talk) 14:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was an extended interview between Lesley Curwen of the BBC World Service and David Carrington, President of Jefferson County Commission on on 28th February 2011. I'll put some material on her shortly but the interview is available here JRPG (talk) 14:54, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the county voted to seek Chapter 9 Bankruptcy over the sewer construction deal. [3] 24.156.216.144 (talk) 22:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Ecology of Jefferson County

[edit]

We are working on an entry for the historical ecology of Jefferson County. It will be uploaded on Tuesday - let us know what you think and please contribute if you are knowledgeable on the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annadestinmccown (talkcontribs) 21:40, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:KBHM Route Map.png Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:KBHM Route Map.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources to consider for inclusion

[edit]

found items which have not been incorporated but might help content

  • Walsh, Mary Williams (18 February 2012), "When a County Runs Off the Cliff", The New York Times, retrieved 19 February 2012, A version of this article appeared in print on February 19, 2012, on page BU1 of the New York edition with the headline: When a County Runs Off the Cliff. {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
    --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 19:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jefferson county alabama

[edit]

While reading you article on Jefferson County I came across the section on the sheriff office. In the section it was stated that the department has 175 deputies, as a Deputy with this department I know we have that many deputies alone in the main county jail in downtown Birmingham. A total for the department is somewhere around 800. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.222.138.158 (talk) 08:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jefferson County, Alabama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Jefferson County, Alabama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]