User talk:Meeve
Justin Gatlin
[edit]Hey there! Looks like in our eagerness to stomp on the vandal, we stomped on each other's toes. Sorry about that ;) -- Ch'marr 20:11, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
hey there
[edit]Hi there, just to let, you know, I also belive in the FSM, however on the FSM talk page, they do not belive our religion is real perhaps, we can help each other, convinve, it otherwise or perhaps help spread FSMism , fell free to talk to me on my discussion page --Codemartin 19:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Meeve user page
[edit]Whoops - forgot i wasn't signed in. Meeve (talk) 19:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. Just lookin out for ya making sure nobody but you edits your page. shirulashem (talk) 19:47, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
chembox question
[edit]I just wanted to let you know that I moved your question from Template talk:Chembox IUPACName where few people are likely to see it and put it at Wikipedia talk:Chemical infobox and replied there. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:56, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Rubik, the Amazing Cube for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rubik, the Amazing Cube is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubik, the Amazing Cube until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBZFan30 (talk) 02:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC)