User talk:Terrace4

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the test area.
You can get help at the Help Desk
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

Nominations

Hi, I think most of those articles have been nominated, and have gone away. If you want to nominate articles just attach a {{delete}}-tag on them and they will be nominated and hopefully go away quickly. Sjakkalle 12:37, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well, I just nominated them, only admins can delete. Sjakkalle 12:46, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hi, Terrace4!

Please read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. It seems that you have wrongly nominated some articles for speedy deletion (I commented about that on Wikipedia:Speedy deletions). Please keep these criteria in mind in the future. Paranoid 23:51, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Salang Tunnel fire

I'd much prefer to leave the article on Salang tunnel fire marked as a stub. There is undoubtedly more information out there, but without decent access to Red Army records, we can't claim that Wikipedia knows all - if we remove the stub mark without adding more certain information to the sketchy details that I've assembled, we run the risk of marking as "fact" things which I firmly believe are speculation.

Compare the relative shakiness of my (web) sources on Salang with the more solid references I've assembled on Kings Cross fire, Oxford Circus fire, Summit tunnel fire, Caldecott Tunnel fire and Holland Tunnel fire. Many of those references are peer-reviewed journal articles, Her Majesty's Railway Inspectorate reports, Health & Safety Executive reports etc. We don't have anything nearly as authoritative on the Salang tunnel fire.

If you do manage to find any more information on Salang tunnel fire, please add it: in the absence of any change, I'll re-instate the stub mark in a month or so.

Notwithstanding this, which I hope you'll intepret as the mildest of reproofs, Welcome to Wikipedia - and please, continue to be Bold in your Edits!

Ecb 16:13, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

Notenglish tag

Please use {{notenglish}} tags on articles in foreign languages. They are not automatically candidates for speedy deletion. Kappa 23:58, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Merritt

Sorry yeah, it was from the Mike Merritt website. I was in the process of putting it in 3rd person, but you are right.

Copyvois

You need to delete the copyviod material when you put a copy vio on an article. I have done it for you this time, --SqueakBox 03:55, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

EGFR

Thanks for your help with this article stub -- much appreciated! Jbetak 07:30, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Zonisamide

You're welcome.

PMID & Quinupristin-dalfopristin

Re: Quinupristin-dalfopristin
If you remove the ":" between "PMID" and the PMID number wikipedia automatically generates a link to PubMed.

PMID: 1234567 vs PMID 1234567

Keep-up the good work! Nephron 22:22, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 7% for major edits and 39% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Streetfighter

please have a look. ++Scooterman 15:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==Please Use Edit Summaries==

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing.

Zpb52 12:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doc!

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia and enjoy. If you're interested in medicine-related articles, we have a place where the medically minded people hang out: WikiProject "Clinical Medicine". You are invited to join. Nephron T|C 21:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please watch

Please watch amygdala. Thank you. Koalabyte 02:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Loestrin

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Loestrin, by Absurdist (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Loestrin is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Loestrin, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Cadderly Bonaduce

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cadderly Bonaduce, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadderly Bonaduce. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 09:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete dosage information for Valganciclovir (Valcyte)

Terrace4,

I noticed that you put the original valganciclovir (Valcyte) stub up and was wondering if you might expand on the Administration section. Perhaps wording similar to the following would better reflect the labeling:

Orally, available in 450 mg pink tablets. For patients who have received a transplant, the recommended dose is 900 mg once daily, starting within 10 days of transplantation and continuing until 100 days post transplantation. HIV patients might initially need to take the dose 900 mg twice daily for the first 3 weeks.

The reference could come from the electronic Medicines Compendium http://emc.medicines.org.uk/emc/assets/c/html/displaydoc.asp?documentid=9315

Thoughts?

ET —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.3.50.254 (talk) 16:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Benzoporphyrin and Benzoporphyrin derivative listed at RfD

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirects Benzoporphyrin and Benzoporphyrin derivative. Since you created these redirects, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion. ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 20:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiology task force

Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!)

-- Addbot (talk) 00:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 12:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pepcid Complete

A tag has been placed on Pepcid Complete requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 23:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Pepcid Complete

I have nominated Pepcid Complete, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pepcid Complete. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 23:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bengay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bengay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bengay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Kvng (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Terrace4. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]